Install sail-operator 0.1.0

[adam-cattermole]

Installs sail-operator using helm from istio-ecosystem/sail-operator@0.1.0 and re-enables integration tests.

Requires #893
Continues #696
Closes #401

[adam-cattermole]

I have tested on top of RLP from #893 and can see things working as expected.

[adam-cattermole]

Note that whilst the supported versions listed here are the ones permitted by the CRD, the operator fails to configure the supported profile when set to v1.22.4 so in reality there's only the option of v1.23.0

[maleck13]

What version of GWAPI does that align with?

[adam-cattermole]

I believe v1.23 is still GWAPI v1.1 and istio v1.24 will support GWAPI v1.2

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.00%. Comparing base (63f1d28) to head (0892348).
Report is 37 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #944      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.49%   79.00%   -2.49%     
==========================================
  Files         102      115      +13     
  Lines        7177     9661    +2484     
==========================================
+ Hits         5849     7633    +1784     
- Misses        898     1624     +726     
+ Partials      430      404      -26     

Flag	Coverage Δ
bare-k8s-integration	9.37% <ø> (+0.47%)	⬆️
controllers-integration	67.94% <ø> (+2.62%)	⬆️
envoygateway-integration	47.33% <ø> (-2.97%)	⬇️
gatewayapi-integration	13.15% <ø> (-1.26%)	⬇️
istio-integration	49.43% <ø> (-4.09%)	⬇️
unit	27.42% <ø> (-0.93%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
api/v1beta1 (u)	90.00% <ø> (-0.91%)	⬇️
api/v1beta2 (u)	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg/common (u)	87.67% <88.88%> (-0.47%)	⬇️
pkg/istio (u)	58.57% <72.05%> (-12.95%)	⬇️
pkg/log (u)	93.18% <ø> (-1.56%)	⬇️
pkg/reconcilers (u)	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg/rlptools (u)	∅ <ø> (∅)
controllers (i)	82.68% <84.23%> (-0.38%)	⬇️

see 73 files with indirect coverage changes

[maleck13]

changes look good. I will verify it here locally also before approving

[adam-cattermole]

I've tested this locally on top of the changes from #952 and the auth side of things is working

[maleck13]

@adam-cattermole is there anything that needs to be done with the quick start? Still haven't got to try this out yet have a backlog of stuff at the moment. Happy to approve though as you seem to have done a fair bit of validation here

[adam-cattermole]

No worries, I'll have a go with the quickstart and report back, but either way I think I'll wait on merge until #952 is in