Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "chore(test): skip test when only docs be changed (#5207)" #5225

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2023

Conversation

programmer04
Copy link
Member

@programmer04 programmer04 commented Nov 22, 2023

This reverts commit 3d5935e.

What this PR does / why we need it:

Job passed is set as required in configuration of branch protection rules for the main. Hence when a file that matches pattern for skipping is edited in the PR it will get stuck forever as here

image

The above is a real-world case hit in PR #5207.

Revert it to get it run again, and reopen a related issue.

Which issue this PR fixes:

Reopens #5206

@czeslavo
Copy link
Contributor

For posterity: this is to unblock #5221 which was affected.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (862c621) 76.8% compared to head (6a1b28b) 74.5%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #5225     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   76.8%   74.5%   -2.3%     
=======================================
  Files        170     170             
  Lines      19056   19056             
=======================================
- Hits       14644   14212    -432     
- Misses      3586    4016    +430     
- Partials     826     828      +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@programmer04 programmer04 merged commit b543b1b into main Nov 22, 2023
59 of 64 checks passed
@programmer04 programmer04 deleted the revert-5207-skip-test-when-docs-change branch November 22, 2023 16:02
@tao12345666333
Copy link
Member

Sorry, let me fix it.

@pmalek pmalek mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2023
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants