Add storage_type for Sparse CuArrays #333
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
dpo
approved these changes
Oct 9, 2024
Member
|
Thank you. I apologize for the long wait. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements
storage_typefor sparseCuArrays. SinceCuArraysand sparseCuArrays` have no common CUDA-specific supertype, we have to handle it with a new case.In the
storage_typefunction I had to specify the memory type, unlike with theCuArray. This is because the LinearOperator constructor expectsSto be aDataTypeand therefore doesn't acceptUnionAlls