Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New version: BitFlags v0.1.8 #95228

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2023

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

UUID: d1d4a3ce-64b1-5f1a-9ba4-7e7e69966f35
Repo: https://github.com/jmert/BitFlags.jl.git
Tree: 2dc09997850d68179b69dafb58ae806167a32b1b

Registrator tree SHA: 1ede4be248caa0b367cc8ebce8a0c76cb916c479
JuliaRegistrator referenced this pull request in jmert/BitFlags.jl Nov 13, 2023
Extend the capability of the expression generator to wrap the resulting
definitions within a `baremodule`, thereby introducing a scope to
isolate flag value names.

This requires some mild rewiring of the macro expansion to "flip" the
interpretation of the name in `BitFlagName::BaseType` to instead
become the module name, and a new optional first argument adds support
for choosing the actual type name (defaulting to `T`) within the
module.

Fixes #13.
Copy link
Contributor

Your new version pull request met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged in the next round.


If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment. You can edit blocking comments, adding [noblock] to them in order to unblock auto-merging.

@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot merged commit 41d136d into master Nov 13, 2023
14 checks passed
@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot deleted the registrator-bitflags-d1d4a3ce-v0.1.8-2a6cf9f69e branch November 13, 2023 02:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants