Skip to content

Update gamma_inc documentation: Q(x,a) should be Q(a,x) #414

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2023

Conversation

aniolm9
Copy link
Contributor

@aniolm9 aniolm9 commented Nov 30, 2022

There is a minor inconsistency in the gamma_inc function documentation. Usually, the normalized upper incomplete gamma function is written as Q(a,x), but in the definition it was written as Q(x,a), and it can be confusing.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 93.63% // Head: 93.63% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (67086b0) compared to base (36c547b).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #414   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.63%   93.63%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines        2767     2767           
=======================================
  Hits         2591     2591           
  Misses        176      176           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 93.63% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/gamma_inc.jl 93.46% <ø> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@devmotion devmotion merged commit dded2dd into JuliaMath:master Feb 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants