Open
Description
Hi,
since there is a PR for rfft!
in FFTW we probably should also add rfft!
in AbstractFFTs?
In general in-place real-to-complex FFT seems to be supported by CuFFT as well, right?
I recall that I was discussing this somewhere with @maleadt but I can't remember exactly.
What do you think about that?
Best,
Felix
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels