Skip to content

Missing in-place real rfft! interface #61

Open
@roflmaostc

Description

@roflmaostc

Hi,

since there is a PR for rfft! in FFTW we probably should also add rfft! in AbstractFFTs?

In general in-place real-to-complex FFT seems to be supported by CuFFT as well, right?

I recall that I was discussing this somewhere with @maleadt but I can't remember exactly.

What do you think about that?

Best,

Felix

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions