Skip to content

Revert "IO: tie lifetime of handle field to container" #43924

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2022

Conversation

Keno
Copy link
Member

@Keno Keno commented Jan 25, 2022

Reverts #43218

That PR last ran without full CI, and it appears current CI was broken by it. Revert for now and we can investigate in the morning and fix it.

@Keno
Copy link
Member Author

Keno commented Jan 25, 2022

buildkite looks fixed with this. Merging.

@Keno Keno merged commit a400a24 into master Jan 25, 2022
@Keno Keno deleted the revert-43218-jn/io-handle-life branch January 25, 2022 08:53
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2022
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2022
Reverts a400a24 (#43924).

Fix lifetime issues with the original attempt. We do not need to prevent
it from being GC-finalized: only to make sure it does not conflict with
a concurrent uv_close callback.
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2022
Reverts a400a24 (#43924).

Fix lifetime issues with the original attempt. We do not need to prevent
it from being GC-finalized: only to make sure it does not conflict with
a concurrent uv_close callback.
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2022
Reverts a400a24 (#43924).

Fix lifetime issues with the original attempt. We do not need to prevent
it from being GC-finalized: only to make sure it does not conflict with
a concurrent uv_close callback.
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2022
Reverts a400a24 (#43924).

Fix lifetime issues with the original attempt. We do not need to prevent
it from being GC-finalized: only to make sure it does not conflict with
a concurrent uv_close callback.
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2022
Reverts a400a24 (#43924).

Fix lifetime issues with the original attempt. We do not need to prevent
it from being GC-finalized: only to make sure it does not conflict with
a concurrent uv_close callback.
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2022
Reverts a400a24 (#43924).

Fix lifetime issues with the original attempt. We do not need to prevent
it from being GC-finalized: only to make sure it does not conflict with
a concurrent uv_close callback.
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2022
Reverts a400a24 (#43924).

Fix lifetime issues with the original attempt. We do not need to prevent
it from being GC-finalized: only to make sure it does not conflict with
a concurrent uv_close callback.
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2022
Reverts a400a24 (#43924).

Fix lifetime issues with the original attempt. We do not need to prevent
it from being GC-finalized: only to make sure it does not conflict with
a concurrent uv_close callback.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant