Skip to content

Conversation

@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

@vtjnash vtjnash commented Aug 27, 2020

No description provided.

While this takes a non-trivial amount of space in the system image
(about the same as putting the Method object here, but less than putting
the full edge to the MethodInstance), it is necessary to avoid the
regression #36462 caused by 2e37784.
@vtjnash vtjnash merged commit 949caad into master Sep 1, 2020
@vtjnash vtjnash deleted the jn/36462+36825 branch September 1, 2020 16:25
@KristofferC KristofferC mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2020
29 tasks
@KristofferC KristofferC mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2020
15 tasks
@vchuravy vchuravy mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2021
27 tasks
@IanButterworth
Copy link
Member

How were the changes to the the good test file coverage_file.info generated here? Was it updated by hand to be an ideal target?

Generally, I'm trying to get a handle on what's known about the reason for the misses, to figure out #44593

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants