Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Port] fix possible NaN in closeness centrality. Closes #1555 #30

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2021

Conversation

etiennedeg
Copy link
Member

This is a port of #1568

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #30 (d514caf) into master (6ab2160) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #30   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.45%   99.46%           
=======================================
  Files         106      106           
  Lines        5554     5556    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         5524     5526    +2     
  Misses         30       30           

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Contributor

Seems like tests that otherwise don't fail have failed on windows (but no elsewhere). Can you review the Windows failure and see if this is ok?

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Contributor

ViralBShah commented Nov 7, 2021

@etienneINSA I have invited you to the JuliaGraphs org, and to have write access to this repo. Since you have a number of open PRs, I think the project could benefit from your contributions - and hopefully write access helps making it a bit easier.

@jpfairbanks jpfairbanks merged commit 4b184cc into JuliaGraphs:master Nov 8, 2021
@etiennedeg
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @ViralBShah for the invitation, I hope I can bring a modest help to this project.

@jpfairbanks This PR makes some tests fail on windows-latest. Why was it merged ? Is it confirmed that the failed tests are not caused by this PR ?

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Contributor

ViralBShah commented Nov 15, 2021

I thought that issue might be #10 and #50. Seems like it is not the BFS related stuff that is failing. Perhaps we should revert?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants