Invalid subtyping in definition of AbstractMesh

[blegat]

In Julia v0.6, there is the following error in precompilation

ERROR: LoadError: LoadError: invalid subtyping in definition of AbstractMesh
Stacktrace:
(...)
while loading /home/travis/.julia/v0.6/GeometryTypes/src/types.jl, in expression starting on line 9

This line is:

abstract AbstractMesh{VertT, FaceT} <: AbstractGeometry

The errors seems to be that AbstractGeometry has the parameters {N, T} an now in Julia v0.6, you cannot subtype a type without specifying all parameters.

[SimonDanisch]

Yes, GeometryTypes does currently not support 0.6 :(

[Benoit9]

Does GLVisualize run on 0.6 without GeometryTypes? I thought 0.6 was required by CUDAnative, which is required by one of your examples?

[SimonDanisch]

It was at some point! haven't tested recently. But a lot of issues have piled up which have higher priority right now...
Also 0.6 has a bug which doesn't let me move on with one of my packages: JuliaLang/julia#20103
And then there is: JuliaArrays/StaticArrays.jl#113, which I'm waiting for!
So the other issues take priority until these are resolved...

[Benoit9]

OK, thanks! GLVisualize looks awesome, and is one of the reasons I decided to install Julia. But no rush.

[SimonDanisch]

Thanks! :) Well, it should all work on 0.5!

[sbromberger]

Just FYI, this failure is causing PlotRecipes.jl to fail as well. :(

[SimonDanisch]

Fun fact, Plots.jl actually halted my efforts to port GeometryTypes to StaticArrays and making it work on 0.6, because the dependencies were spread out quite far and I was running out of time ;)

[blegat]

@SimonDanisch Any update ? The two issues you mentionned earlier have now been fixed.

[SimonDanisch]

yes... it's working :D But 0.6 only because of staticarrays... I still rely quite a bit on 0.5,,, but maybe it's time to just have one working tag for 0.5 and then have a cut there!

[mkborregaard]

Not working for me? On 0.6 I have this issue even with GeometryTypes master. Is it supposed to work now?

[KristofferC]

Pretty sure #80 needs to be merged

[rdeits]

@SimonDanisch it looks like on master we no longer have AbstractMesh <: AbstractGeometry (which caused some minor breakage in https://github.com/rdeits/DrakeVisualizer.jl ). Do you want to restore that relationship eventually?

One way to do it would be to change the AbstractMesh type to something like:

abstract type AbstractMesh{N, T, VertT <: StaticArray{Tuple{N}, T}, FaceT} <: AbstractGeometry{N, T}
end

[SimonDanisch]

The mesh type actually needs to be rewritten quite a bit for 0.6 i'd say... It still has bugs and I'm increasingly unhappy with the design. In any case, it should definitely be an AbstractGeometry ;)

[rdeits]

Ok, then I'll just work around the issue until it becomes an AbstractGeometry again.