Introduce ArrayTable based on Dictionaries.jl #66
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
andyferris
force-pushed
the
ajf/dictionaries
branch
from
0176442 to
6e47334
Compare
andyferris
force-pushed
the
ajf/dictionaries
branch
from
6e47334 to
f6fc9fe
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This a more DataFrame-like table, where the containers for the columns (or rows) is a Dictionaries.jl
AbstractDictionary{Symbol, AbstractArray}.In the context of future developments:
DictionaryTablewhere the rows are indexed by some dictionary key, and the columns are dictionaries that share the same keys & tokens. I find I almost always want to be able to look up rows based on some value! (Note - the column indices are anAbstractIndices <: AbstractDictionaryand can just be one of the columns... or we could have multiple primary keys, grouped/partitioned tables, etc...).