merge master and resolve conflicts #6
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Reviewed-by: vlivanov, thartmann
Reviewed-by: erikj, alanb, jjg
….java failed with "Total [200] - Expected [400]" Reviewed-by: serb
Reviewed-by: aivanov, kizune
…gions Reviewed-by: matsaave, ccheung
Reviewed-by: aph, dcubed
Reviewed-by: kvn
Reviewed-by: alanb, sspitsyn
…97977 is fixed Reviewed-by: dcubed
…ilation Reviewed-by: mcimadamore
Reviewed-by: lancea
Reviewed-by: erikj, cstein
Reviewed-by: erikj
Reviewed-by: darcy
Reviewed-by: redestad, jvernee, alanb
Reviewed-by: fjiang, yadongwang, shade
Reviewed-by: fyang, gcao
…sts/TckDriver.java test Reviewed-by: alanb, jpai, michaelm
…ic running Reviewed-by: serb, erikj, ihse
Reviewed-by: mgronlun
Reviewed-by: mgronlun
…ently on a VM Reviewed-by: tr, serb
Reviewed-by: kbarrett, tschatzl
Reviewed-by: fyang, chagedorn
Reviewed-by: serb, erikj
…ization Reviewed-by: rkennke, phh
…til 8297979 is fixed Reviewed-by: tschatzl
Reviewed-by: mgronlun
…(v)) failed: narrow klass value can never be zero Reviewed-by: sspitsyn, eosterlund, kbarrett
…ny final field modification Reviewed-by: alanb, cjplummer, sspitsyn
Reviewed-by: dholmes, sgehwolf
…d: allocating handle inside NoHandleMark" Reviewed-by: egahlin
Reviewed-by: clanger, stuefe
Reviewed-by: vromero
Reviewed-by: kvn, thartmann, chagedorn
Reviewed-by: tschatzl, iwalulya
8284363: Redundant imports in BoundMethodHandle Reviewed-by: jvernee
Reviewed-by: mullan, dcubed
Reviewed-by: dholmes, stuefe
Reviewed-by: bpb
…f.hpp Reviewed-by: dholmes, mgronlun
…e.TRACKING is set. Co-authored-by: Jason Fordham <jclf@azul.com> Reviewed-by: prr
…main loop has no opaque node? Reviewed-by: thartmann
Reviewed-by: stuefe, mgronlun, egahlin
Reviewed-by: smarks, alanb
Reviewed-by: mullan
Reviewed-by: jlaskey, alanb
Reviewed-by: never
Reviewed-by: prr, aivanov, azvegint
Reviewed-by: dfuchs, vtewari, jpai
Reviewed-by: fyang, luhenry
…th Windows shortcuts Reviewed-by: serb, abhiscxk
Reviewed-by: iris
Reviewed-by: jpai, rpressler
Reviewed-by: egahlin, stuefe
Reviewed-by: sviswanathan, kvn, jbhateja, fgao, xgong
…JavaDoc-specified check Reviewed-by: rriggs
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
58 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Merge up with master then manually merged some conflicts from recent java.lang.invoke cleanups