-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #1394 #1395
Merged
Merged
Fix #1394 #1395
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -691,6 +691,11 @@ describe('Select', () => { | |
expect(onChange, 'was called with', 0); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it('displays the X button for 0 value', () => { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks for also adding tests for this 😁 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. You're welcome 😉 |
||
wrapper.setPropsForChild({ value: 0 }); | ||
expect(ReactDOM.findDOMNode(instance).querySelector('.Select-clear'), 'not to equal', undefined); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
describe('with multi=true', () => { | ||
|
||
beforeEach(() => { | ||
|
@@ -962,6 +967,11 @@ describe('Select', () => { | |
'to have text', 'No'); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it('displays the X button for false value', () => { | ||
wrapper.setPropsForChild({ value: false }); | ||
expect(ReactDOM.findDOMNode(instance).querySelector('.Select-clear'), 'not to equal', undefined); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
describe('with multi=true', () => { | ||
|
||
beforeEach(() => { | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not keen on the loose equality operator - I know how it works, but given the number of people who use / contribute to this project, without an explicit comment it could be misinterpreted.
How about we replace this with a more explicit
value === undefined || value === null
so that the intended behaviour is explicit?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✅ Done
Replaced as proposed by
this.props.value === undefined || this.props.value === null