ID based search for JSTOR #336
Conversation
en/collect/add-entry-using-an-id.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ### JSTOR | ||
|
|
||
| Jstor is a digital library of academic content in many disciplines. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You could take the same description of Jstor as in https://docs.jabref.org/collect/import-using-online-bibliographic-database
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please, put the 2 sentences in different paragraphs, so as to reproduce the layout used for the other search engines.
en/collect/add-entry-using-an-id.md
Outdated
| ### JSTOR | ||
|
|
||
| Jstor is a digital library of academic content in many disciplines. | ||
| ID search is carried out using either the [stable url](https://support.jstor.org/hc/en-us/articles/115004872507-Citation-Management-Permanently-Linking-to-Content-on-JSTOR) or a DOI. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please, clarify what is the "stable url" compared to DOI: [Jstor stable url].
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The stable url is basically the same as a doi.
Some stable urls only contain the doi(http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/501484 for example)
while most use a common prefix(https://www.jstor.org/stable/90002164 = 10.2307/90002164)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In this help section, that would be too much information. I suggest : "ID search is carried out using either the Jstor stable url or the DOI."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Which is what if have written.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Almost 😉 : I recommended [stable jstor url]. Plus "the" or "a" for both.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
oh, you are correct, fixed.
mlep
left a comment
mlep
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for your involvement in improving JabRef!
|
Need to postpone a merge, because we needed to disable JSTOR (at JabRef/jabref#7229), because JabRef gets blocked by JSTOR. We currently have no clue how to fix it. |
3 participants
implemented in JabRef/jabref#7145