Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix/field inheritance #5282
Fix/field inheritance #5282
Changes from 1 commit
ce72cb6
b966777
9702223
cad2192
345cbfb
89f7a61
3d1bf69
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you can simply the code a bit:
Create an EnumSet of the fields and check with contains if the field is in the set.
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/EnumSet.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your suggestion, but I am not sure, if this fits here. First, I have to list the fields anyway, so I don't think, it would simplify the code. Second, the set is accessed only in one single place, so making it a static class member would extend the scope unnecessarily and clutter the class member list. Creating it locally would improve neither code nor performance, I guess. What do you think?