Skip to content

Conversation

@davidtruong
Copy link
Contributor

Android support for messageID.

return this.templateId;
}

public String getMessageId() { return this.messageId; }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should be fine going forward right? before we make the change on the server, the messageId won't exist yet. so... does this need to be made an option? or we just synchronize our deploy of server code with release of SDK update?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The server code should go out first since the old SDK won't process anything related to messageID. I'll deploy the mobile SDKs afterward.

@jontsai
Copy link

jontsai commented Aug 30, 2016

a few questions/comments, otherwise LFTM

IterableNotificationData iterableNotificationData = new IterableNotificationData(iterableDataString);
if (IterableApi.sharedInstance != null) {
IterableApi.sharedInstance.setNotificationData(iterableNotificationData);
IterableApi.sharedInstance.trackPushOpen(iterableNotificationData.getCampaignId(), iterableNotificationData.getTemplateId());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems like it would make sense to use the iterableNotificationData that you just set? Or pass in the whole object? Rather than each param? But this is fine too

@dontgitit
Copy link
Contributor

lftm

@jontsai
Copy link

jontsai commented Aug 30, 2016

LGTM

@davidtruong davidtruong merged commit 40d6f2f into master Sep 15, 2016
@davidtruong davidtruong deleted the feature/ITBL-1261-track-push-opens-sends branch April 11, 2018 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants