AI-powered executive advisory for software projects. Point it at any local repository and get structured assessments from CTO, CPO, COO, CMO, CFO, and CSO perspectives — grounded in actual code signals and live competitive research.
The system walks a repository, extracts structured signals (stack, docs, CI/CD, tests, dependencies, security), then runs six specialist analyses before synthesizing them into a prioritized executive brief.
[Repo] → Ingestion → ┌─ CTO Analysis ─┐
├─ CPO Analysis ─┤
├─ COO Analysis ─┤ → Research → Synthesis → Report
├─ CMO Analysis ─┤
├─ CFO Analysis ─┤
└─ CSO Analysis ─┘
The analysis rubrics live in prompts/ and are model-agnostic markdown — they work with any AI assistant that can read files and follow instructions. Adapter-specific wiring is installed separately per tool.
npx @isonimus/c-level initThe CLI asks which AI assistant you use and scaffolds the right files into the current directory:
C-Level Advisory System
Which AI assistant do you use?
1. Claude Code — Full multi-phase pipeline with slash commands
2. Cursor — Agent rules via @rule-name in Cursor Chat
To install into a specific path or skip the prompt:
npx @isonimus/c-level init /path/to/my-project
npx @isonimus/c-level init --adapter claude-code
npx @isonimus/c-level init --adapter cursorPrerequisites:
- The AI assistant of your choice (Claude Code or Cursor)
- Internet access required for competitive research (
/research,@research) - Target repository must be readable on the local filesystem
Open Claude Code in the repo and use slash commands:
/assess /path/to/your/repo # Full pipeline
/cto /path/to/your/repo # CTO only
/cpo /path/to/your/repo # CPO only
/coo /path/to/your/repo # COO only
/cmo /path/to/your/repo # CMO only
/cfo /path/to/your/repo # CFO only
/cso /path/to/your/repo # CSO only
/research <description> # Competitive landscape
/ingest /path/to/your/repo # Signal extraction only
/reports # List saved reports
In Cursor Chat or Agent, reference rules by name:
@assess /path/to/your/repo
@cto /path/to/your/repo
@cpo /path/to/your/repo
@coo /path/to/your/repo
@cmo /path/to/your/repo
@cfo /path/to/your/repo
@cso /path/to/your/repo
@research <description>
@ingest /path/to/your/repo
@reports
All assessments use a 1–10 scale:
| Range | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 1–3 | Critical issues. Significant rework needed before production-worthy. |
| 4–6 | Functional but with substantial gaps. Needs focused investment. |
| 7–8 | Good. Minor improvements and polish needed. |
| 9–10 | Excellent. Industry-leading in this dimension. |
Reports are saved to reports/<repo_name>_<YYYY-MM-DD>.md. The reports/ directory is git-ignored by default — reports often contain proprietary analysis of private codebases. To commit a report, force-add it with git add -f.
- Ingestion — walks the repo, extracts structured signals: stack, docs, CI, tests, deps, security
- CTO — technical assessment: architecture, debt, scalability, build process
- CPO — product assessment: clarity, onboarding, UX signals, feature gaps
- COO — operational assessment: CI/CD maturity, observability, process hygiene
- CMO — marketing assessment: brand, community, distribution, growth loops
- CFO — financial assessment: cost structure, licensing risk, revenue readiness
- CSO — security assessment: threat model, vulnerability surface, compliance readiness
- Research — web search for competitive products, feature comparison, market positioning
- Synthesis — rolls all findings into a prioritized executive brief
The synthesis weights each dimension: CTO 22% / CPO 22% / CMO 18% / COO 13% / CSO 10% / CFO 10% / Market 5%.
All analysis logic lives in prompts/. These files are the core of the system — edit them to tune the rubrics for your context.
| File | Role |
|---|---|
prompts/ingest.md |
Repo signal extraction |
prompts/cto.md |
CTO analysis rubric |
prompts/cpo.md |
CPO analysis rubric |
prompts/coo.md |
COO analysis rubric |
prompts/cmo.md |
CMO analysis rubric |
prompts/cfo.md |
CFO analysis rubric |
prompts/cso.md |
CSO analysis rubric |
prompts/research.md |
Competitive research instructions |
prompts/synthesize.md |
Executive synthesis rubric |
See CONTRIBUTING.md for how to improve rubrics, add new C-level perspectives, or build adapters for additional AI assistants.