separated typed relation field into its own category #60
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
+1 this works for me and resolves the issue I was having in Islandora/documentation#1715 |
mjordan
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2020
| @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ | |||
| * id = "typed_relation", | |||
| * label = @Translation("Typed Relation"), | |||
| * module = "controlled_access_terms", | |||
| * category = @Translation("Typed Relation"), | |||
| * description = @Translation("Implements a typed relation field"), | |||
| * default_formatter = "typed_relation_default", | |||
| * default_widget = "typed_relation_default", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed by community, ready to merge.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
GitHub Issue: (Islandora/documentation#1715)
What does this Pull Request do?
Separates the typed relation field into its own category
What's new?
a doc comment change that separates the typed relation field into its own category so those fields are easier to distinguish from regular entity reference fields
How should this be tested?
Additional Notes:
Screenshot:
Interested parties
@Islandora/8-x-committers @antbrown