Skip to content

Update intro.rst #662

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update intro.rst #662

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

oleksandr-pavlyk
Copy link
Contributor

@samaid

Made Intro section less SYCL centric. Main goal is to avoid references to SYCL as much as possible. Otherwise we will end up teaching Python users DPC++. I understand that references to SYCL in dpctl are unavoidable but still I truly believe we can educate general Python users how to use XPU without the need to read SYCL specs

Made Intro section less SYCL centric. Main goal is to avoid references to SYCL as much as possible. Otherwise we will end up teaching Python users DPC++. I understand that references to SYCL in dpctl are unavoidable but still I truly believe we can educate general Python users how to use XPU without the need to read SYCL specs
`Python buffer protocol <https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/buffer.html>`_
using SYCL USM memory; making it possible to create Python objects that are
backed by SYCL USM memory.
Data Parallel Control ``dpctl`` is the Python library that controls multiple devices of a platform, features classes for
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this statement is misleading. dpctl does not control devices. It allows user to specify the XPU which executes user's data-parallel code (including a call to oneMKL). It is even more fine-grained than that, but articulating that takes exposing the reader to some concepts of SYCL.

@diptorupd
Copy link
Contributor

@oleksandr-pavlyk refer #670. I have rewritten the intro in that PR addressing some of the concerns raised here.

@oleksandr-pavlyk
Copy link
Contributor Author

This change has been superseded by changes in #712.

@oleksandr-pavlyk oleksandr-pavlyk deleted the docs/intro branch December 25, 2021 14:13
@diptorupd
Copy link
Contributor

@oleksandr-pavlyk I am fine with closing the PR. But, the main intro section on the landing page was not updated in #712 and remains a TODO.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants