Skip to content

Added project and repository definitions to Glossary #697

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 24, 2024

Conversation

claredillon
Copy link
Member

Following an actions from an ISPO WG meeting in May 2024, I have added definitions for project and repository to the Glossary. I re-ordered the existing entries to make them alphabetical.

Following an actions from an ISPO WG meeting in May 2024, I have added definitions for project and repository to the Glossary. I re-ordered the existing entries to make them alphabetical.
@claredillon
Copy link
Member Author

@dellagustin @jeffabailey This is following up on our ISPO WG discussion - can you check to see if the definitions match your understanding please?

@spier spier added the 📖 Type - Content Work Working on contents is the main focus of this issue / PR label Jun 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@jeffabailey jeffabailey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

Copy link
Contributor

@jeffabailey jeffabailey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

@spier spier merged commit d21f5cd into InnerSourceCommons:main Jun 24, 2024
8 checks passed
@spier
Copy link
Member

spier commented Jun 24, 2024

@claredillon @jeffabailey thank you for your work on this!

I took this PR as an opportunity to finally get the glossary added to the book:
https://patterns.innersourcecommons.org/appendix/glossary

While it is still small, it is a start :)

@dellagustin-sap
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @claredillon , a point for future improvement is to clarify how the terms organization, repository and project are used across different source code management (SCM) systems (e.g., GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, Forgejo, BitBucket, etc...).
There is also some ambiguity on the term organization that we need to sort out (organization as currently described vs organization as used in SCMs.

@claredillon
Copy link
Member Author

@dellagustin-sap - thanks for the feedback - would love to explore that ambiguity more... I wonder if we could get others more familiar with the other SCMs to help out... I am only familiar with GitHub.

@claredillon
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @spier and @jeffabailey for the reviews and merging

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📖 Type - Content Work Working on contents is the main focus of this issue / PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants