Skip to content

Improved Review Committee pattern #635

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 6, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion patterns/2-structured/review-committee.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ Company A wants to introduce its first InnerSource initiative. Most managers in
- Every InnerSource project is to be given the chance to react to feedback received on one session of the review committee until the next session in order to avoid shutting down the project prematurely.
- An InnerSource project leader can also present the motion to be shut down on its own initiative on a review committee. The review committee then has to decide whether or not the business units using the software need to be given time to put measures in place to ensure that development and/or maintenance of the codebase continues until an alternative solution to development by the InnerSource community is found (if business relevant or mission critical).
- The review committee should convene regularly. A cadence of two meetings per year has proven successful.
- The review committee can become optional, if InnerSource has been widely adopted and understood by the organization.

![Review Committee Sketch](../../assets/img/review-committee-sketch.jpg)

Expand All @@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ Company A wants to introduce its first InnerSource initiative. Most managers in

## Known Instances

* BIOS at Robert Bosch GmbH
* BIOS at Robert Bosch GmbH (in the early stages of adoption, only - 2009-2012)

## Status

Expand Down