|
| 1 | +## Title |
| 2 | +* Badly named SW components |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +## Problem |
| 5 | +People can't find internally developed solutions becuse of poor naming of SW components. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## Context |
| 8 | +* Reusable Software component(s) are available internally but users can't easily find these. |
| 9 | +* This problem is more likely to occur where there are silos in the company (e.g., larger companies; smaller companies may have fewer opportunities for reuse of internally developed software). |
| 10 | +* The company traditionally has been bad at sharing across silos (people don't have the culture of sharing). |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +## Forces |
| 13 | +* Enough people are contributing things to inner sourcing that it is becoming hard to find components. |
| 14 | +* No good internal search engine (or not connected to git repositories; and difficult to make this change happen) |
| 15 | +* Users may not be able to find the people responsible even if they know where the common places are. |
| 16 | +* People even when they know about inner source, they search, can't find something and become discouraged from looking at that site again. |
| 17 | +* Hard to find stuff in github (especially if names are cryptic and keywords aren't used). |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +## Solution |
| 20 | +* Improve findability within a repo (use meaningful project name; don't use code names for projects; put keywords into descriptions) |
| 21 | + - **note: problem/pattern: solution exists but people aren't following it** |
| 22 | + - **ask PayPal folks about their practices set up to address this problem** |
| 23 | + * Use tagging (tag repositories) (_validated_) |
| 24 | + * Use labels |
| 25 | + * Pull in Repo names, descriptions and README.md files into the search engine (not the code itself) |
| 26 | + * Instate a process change to first check for internal solutions for this problem |
| 27 | + * Concierge service (guide) to help product people find stuff. Might not scale but could be helpful in the beginning. |
| 28 | + -Encourage the community to identify redundancy and make recommendations for the better package to use. Could be a dedicated role within a company, someone with a complete overview of what is going on |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +## Known instances |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +## Desired Resulting Context |
| 33 | +* Internal components are easily visible |
| 34 | +* Developers looking for code can search for it and find it quickly. |
| 35 | +* Developers are now looking internally for software components |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +## Status |
| 38 | +Brainstormed pattern idea reviewed |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +## Authors |
| 41 | +* Georg Grutter |
| 42 | +* Erin Bank |
| 43 | +* Padma Sudarsan |
| 44 | +* Tim Yao |
0 commit comments