Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sweeping algorithms for tree tensor networks #44

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2023

Conversation

leburgel
Copy link
Contributor

Moved here from ITensor/ITensorTDVP.jl#43

A first working attempt at generalizing MPS sweeping algorithms to tensor networks on arbitrary tree geometries. All algorithms should work for both ITensors.MPS and ITensorNetworks.TreeTensorNetworksState (except some of the newer additions which I haven't generalized yet), with the same syntax currently used in ITensorTDVP.jl.

Aside from some patching to work with MPS and trees using a common interface, the main internal changes are how the sequence of update steps within an individual sweep is generated and how individual local updates are performed. The idea is that a sequence of SweepSteps is generated for the given geometry depending on the kind of sweeping being used (e.g. 1- or 2-site, reverse steps or not), where each SweepStep contains all the information needed for a single local update. This allows to split off the geometry-dependent part and adds flexibility in the sweeping sequences used. In addition, by treating each local update step in the same way we can use a single update routine for all local updates (whether it's a bond- or site-update, forwards or backwards evolution...) irrespective of what happens before or after in the sequence.

@mtfishman
Copy link
Member

Thanks @leburgel, this is great. It is a big step forward for ITensor, and will become our standard DMRG/TDVP code!

@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit 18bad9f into ITensor:main Jan 11, 2023
@mtfishman mtfishman mentioned this pull request Jan 11, 2023
@leburgel leburgel deleted the tree_sweeping branch January 12, 2023 11:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants