ZOOM: Oxford 7.5T Cryomagnet into IBEX

[KathrynBaker]

As a scientist on ZOOM I want to use the 7.5T magnet during the cycle starting on the 14th of November

Acceptance Criteria

1. I am able to create blocks and interact with the 7.5T magnet in IBEX as I can in SECI - setting/reading the same values

[kjwoodsISIS]

From: Alba Venero, Diego (STFC,RAL,ISIS)
Sent: 15 September 2017 11:24
To: Woods, Kevin (Tessella,RAL,ISIS)
Cc: Baker, Kathryn (STFC,RAL,ISIS)
Subject: RE: 7.5T magnet on ZOOM in Cylce 2017/03

Hi Kevin,

Yes, you are right it is the 7.5T magnet.

Cheers,

Diego

From: Woods, Kevin (Tessella,RAL,ISIS)
Sent: 15 September 2017 11:05
To: Alba Venero, Diego (STFC,RAL,ISIS)
Cc: Baker, Kathryn (STFC,RAL,ISIS)
Subject: 7.5T magnet on ZOOM in Cylce 2017/03

Hi Diego,

Kathryn tells me you plan to use the “7T magnet” with IBEX in Cycle 2017/03.

On checking the sample environment pages, I see that there is no 7T magnet.
There is a 7.5T magnet - https://www.isis.stfc.ac.uk/Pages/75T-Magnet.aspx.
I assume that’s the one you mean. Is that correct? (I want to be sure that we provide support
for the right magnet).

Thanks,

Kevin

[AdrianPotter]

• The VI needed for this ticket can be determined by looking at the SANS2D SECI configurations. The magnet will probably be listed as 7T rather than 7.5T
• Once you've found the VI, talk to @GDH-ISIS about integrating it into IBEX. It'll probably be an LvDCOM.
• It would also be advisable to talk to Diego (in email above) about what controls they want in the IOC/OPI. Depending on the complexity of the VI front panel, we may or may not make them all available.
• I would recommend we move the VI into the IBEX repository rather than calling into LabView Modules to prevent further coupling.
• Once you've got the necessary requirements. Write the IOC as normal. A sensible approach would be to write the emulator to talk to the VI front panel, then and the IOC and OPI on top. This will provide some useful verification.

[Tom-Willemsen]

Impeded awaiting confirmation from Diego about exactly what he needs from this ticket. Kathryn is meeting with him tomorrow to discuss this.

[KathrynBaker]

I have checked with Deigo, and it is unlikely to be needed for next cycle now (this is in light of commissioning this cycle), and if it is available then it can be run without scripting options.

I will move this back into the backlog for the time being. If the work to integrate this is significant I will let someone who has a better idea of how significant decide if it needs to be re-proposed for the next sprint, otherwise I will re-propose it for the Christmas sprint if it will be needed in the February cycle.