Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(comp:date-picker): modify date-picker according to current desigin #859

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 25, 2022

Conversation

sallerli1
Copy link
Contributor

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated or not needed
  • Docs and demo have been added/updated or not needed

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Component style update
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Application (the showcase website) / infrastructure changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior?

  1. 修改日期选择视觉检视样式问题
  2. 修改日期选择浮窗内输入框无聚焦样式的问题
  3. 日期面板日期类型默认展示6行
  4. 日期面板增加除日期类型以外的当前时间标记(当前月、当前年、当前季度)
  5. fix: 解决部分浏览器focus方法不触发focus事件导致聚焦样式失效的问题
  6. fix: 解决浮窗内日期输入框在日期选择为undefined时无法清除的问题
  7. fix: 解决日期范围选择面板所在view联动变化不正确的问题
  8. 修改overlay-gap class 为 overlay-separator

Other information

@idux-bot
Copy link

idux-bot bot commented Apr 25, 2022

This preview will be available after the AzureCI is passed.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #859 (80dde73) into main (2a9e7b0) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 87.21%.

❗ Current head 80dde73 differs from pull request most recent head 622cddf. Consider uploading reports for the commit 622cddf to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #859      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.66%   93.64%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         647      647              
  Lines       62994    63055      +61     
  Branches     7697     7699       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        59004    59050      +46     
- Misses       3990     4005      +15     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...nents/date-picker/src/composables/useActiveDate.ts 93.95% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/components/date-picker/src/DatePicker.tsx 97.02% <57.14%> (-0.96%) ⬇️
...ges/components/date-picker/src/content/Content.tsx 93.29% <64.70%> (-3.03%) ⬇️
...ges/components/date-picker/src/DateRangePicker.tsx 95.61% <70.00%> (-0.75%) ⬇️
...mponents/date-picker/src/composables/useControl.ts 91.73% <83.33%> (-1.19%) ⬇️
...s/components/_private/date-panel/src/DatePanel.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
..._private/date-panel/src/composables/useMaxIndex.ts 92.98% <100.00%> (-1.76%) ⬇️
...s/_private/date-panel/src/panel-body/PanelBody.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...s/_private/date-panel/src/panel-body/PanelCell.tsx 97.72% <100.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
...rivate/date-panel/src/panel-header/PanelHeader.tsx 92.26% <100.00%> (+0.33%) ⬆️
... and 7 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2a9e7b0...622cddf. Read the comment docs.

@sallerli1 sallerli1 changed the title Feat date time picker saller 修改日期选择视觉检视与测试问题 Apr 25, 2022
@sallerli1 sallerli1 changed the title 修改日期选择视觉检视与测试问题 fix(comp:data-picker): modify data-picker according to current desigin Apr 25, 2022
@danranVm danranVm merged commit 7efdcb9 into IDuxFE:main Apr 25, 2022
@sallerli1 sallerli1 changed the title fix(comp:data-picker): modify data-picker according to current desigin fix(comp:date-picker): modify date-picker according to current desigin Apr 25, 2022
@sallerli1 sallerli1 deleted the feat-date-time-picker-saller branch February 20, 2023 06:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants