go 1.24rc1

[stefanb]

Announcement:

• https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/vYMfuq_XO6w

Draft release notes: https://tip.golang.org/doc/go1.24

Go 1.24 milestone:

Go release dashboard: https://dev.golang.org/release

Downloads: https://go.dev/dl/

Related previous:

• go 1.23, go@1.22 1.22.6 (new formula) #175310

Related upstream:

• build: adopt Go 1.22 as bootstrap toolchain for Go 1.24 golang/go#64751

Runs:

• https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/actions/runs/12321762564?pr=201070

Problematic dependant formulae:

• garble: Go version "go1.24rc1" is too new; Go linker patches aren't available for go1.24 or later yet
• go-critic: test failure: Minitest::Assertion: Expected /sloppyLen:\ len\(str\)\ <=\ 0\ can\ be\ len\(str\)\ ==\ 0/ to match "internal error: package \"fmt\" without types was imported from \"command-line-arguments\"\n".
• goplus: test failure
• govulncheck: test failure: govulncheck: Loading packages failed, possibly due to a mismatch between the Go version used to build govulncheck and the Go version on PATH. Consider rebuilding govulncheck with the current Go version. ➡️ revision bump as in govulncheck: build with go1.23 #181468
• llgo: error: package requires newer Go version go1.24 (application built with go1.23)
• staticcheck: test failure: unexpected token at '{"code":"compile","severity":"er'
• ...
• syncthing: Fails with Go 1.24: runtime go1.24rc1 not found in compat.yaml syncthing/syncthing#9870
• tfproviderlint: test failure:internal error: package "log" without types was imported from "github.com/russellcardullo/terraform-provider-pingdom/pingdom [github.com/russellcardullo/terraform-provider-pingdom/pingdom.test]"
• ...

---

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---