sidekick 0.5.3 (new formula)

[bevanjkay]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

Suggesting sidekick-cli for the name, because there is an overlap with an existing cask sidekick.

[chenrui333]

Suggesting sidekick-cli for the name, because there is an overlap with an existing cask sidekick.

I dont feel like we need to do it because of the name overlapping?

[bevanjkay]

I dont feel like we need to do it because of the name overlapping?

@chenrui333 Was based on the comment here - Homebrew/brew#16309 (comment) - which isn't really documented. But I'm not too concerned either way.

[chenrui333]

I dont feel like we need to do it because of the name overlapping?

@chenrui333 Was based on the comment here - Homebrew/brew#16309 (comment) - which isn't really documented. But I'm not too concerned either way.

I see, sounds good then :)

[github-actions]

@bevanjkay has requested bottles to be published to this PR.