-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added new endpoint reverse_2 #1
Conversation
LANGUAGE: English | ||
MODEL: gpt-3.5-turbo | ||
# top_p: 1 | ||
# temperature: 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code patch adds a permissions section with read and write permissions. The on section triggers the GitHub Actions workflow when a pull request is opened, reopened or synchronized. The existing code_review job has been renamed to test, and it no longer checks out code or installs dependencies.
Instead, the workflow now fetches the anc95/ChatGPT-CodeReview action, which takes care of checking out the code and installing any necessary dependencies. This action uses OpenAI's GPT API to review code as natural language description. It takes OPENAI_API_KEY, LANGUAGE, MODEL as arguments and optionally top_p and temperature values for the model.
The one improvement suggestion would be to add more error handling in case of unexpected results from the API. Overall, the new code patch seems to be an improvement over the previous one.
} | ||
fmt.Fprintf(w, "Hello, %s!\n", reversed) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
http.Serve(lis, nil) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code patch adds a new HTTP handler function that reverses the name passed in as a query parameter and returns a greeting. The reverse function is called using the reverser.Reverse method.
As far as bug risks are concerned, one thing to be cautious of is that if the "name" parameter is not provided or is empty, then the Reverse method may panic or return unexpected results. Therefore, it may be helpful to add input validation or default value handling for the "name" parameter.
In terms of improvement suggestions, it would be beneficial to provide more context on what the overall system does and how this new feature fits into it. Additionally, adding some basic testing for this new handler would help ensure its functionality and prevent regressions.
No description provided.