Skip to content

Conversation

@shantsis
Copy link
Contributor

Progress on #2525
Closes #2156

Stage link: https://20211116t174953-dot-webalmanac.uk.r.appspot.com/en/2021/jamstack

Basic edits and some TODOs for the authors to review. I don't know this content at all so another editor should review this all well

@shantsis shantsis added the editing Content excellence label Nov 30, 2021
@shantsis shantsis added this to the 2021 Launch 🚀 milestone Nov 30, 2021
@tunetheweb
Copy link
Member

I don't know this content at all so another editor should review this all well

I reviewed the content, but left the grammar and figure descriptions for the editing phase.

@shantsis
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't know this content at all so another editor should review this all well

I reviewed the content, but left the grammar and figure descriptions for the editing phase.

Great! Sometimes I feel like if I change the grammar without understanding the content it can change the meaning. I think I left at least one TODO of something that needs grammar tweaking but didn’t know how to fix it

The number of sites in Europe for desktop is 23k versus mobile 26k, which is 1.1% of all web sites in that region. In the Americas, there are 26k desktop sites and 24k mobiles sites (1.2% of sites). Asia has almost the same numbers with 21k desktop and 22k mobile as the leading region with greater Jamstack adoption at 1.45%. Oceania and Africa have way lower overall numbers, but they have way greater Jamstack adoption. Oceania 2.19% and Africa 2%. Overall site adoption is at 1.1%.

Oceania and Africa have way lower overall numbers, but they have way greater Jamstack adoption. Oceania 2.19% and Africa 2%.
{# TODO - do you need to list the numbers for each, or should percentages be enough? or numbers for just the first as a baseline #}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We generally try to avoid absolute numbers and prefer percentages. The make no sense without context of how many they are out of.

However sometimes they can be useful to set context - particularly for small numbers (e.g. "it's only 0.1% but in the context of the web that's still a massive number of 600,000 sites"). But that should be the exception and not over used.

Copy link
Member

@tunetheweb tunetheweb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Made some suggestions here for visibility. However I'm going to merge these right away as running out of time here.

@tunetheweb
Copy link
Member

I've added some better descriptions but not all. I'm going to merge this as think these edits are good. Leaving TODOs in place for better descriptions.

@tunetheweb tunetheweb merged commit 69a35e6 into main Dec 1, 2021
@tunetheweb tunetheweb deleted the jamstack-2021-edits branch December 1, 2021 02:29
@denar90
Copy link
Member

denar90 commented Dec 1, 2021

@shantsis thanks for the edits 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

editing Content excellence

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Jamstack 2021

4 participants