Skip to content

Conversation

@BadPrograms
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.77%. Comparing base (09661d1) to head (0095946).
Report is 7 commits behind head on v2.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             v2.x      #80   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.77%   96.77%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         341      341           
  Branches       17       17           
=======================================
  Hits          330      330           
  Misses          6        6           
  Partials        5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ def __len__(self):
def __iter__(self):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe you could put a type hint here too?

@ChrisMzz
Copy link
Contributor

@BadPrograms L2671, nodes_at_t should return list[int] instead of just list

Otherwise it all looks good to me 👍

yield from self.lineagetrees.items()

def __getitem__(self, key):
def __getitem__(self, key) -> lineageTree:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please type hing on the arguments too

@leoguignard leoguignard merged commit 3ffcbc7 into v2.x Jun 30, 2025
3 checks passed
@BadPrograms BadPrograms deleted the typehint-for-ltm branch July 1, 2025 08:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants