You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems that could provide insight about the origin of the inequality: " If the LAC is less than 1, the inequality is primarily due to the relatively many small or poor individuals. If the LAC is greater than 1, the inequality is primarily due to the few largest or wealthiest individuals." It remains to be seen what happens if the origin is due to both factors as is often the case in wiki data.
It seems that could provide insight about the origin of the inequality: " If the LAC is less than 1, the inequality is primarily due to the relatively many small or poor individuals. If the LAC is greater than 1, the inequality is primarily due to the few largest or wealthiest individuals." It remains to be seen what happens if the origin is due to both factors as is often the case in wiki data.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_asymmetry_coefficient
More details in the original article:
https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1139:DIIPSO]2.0.CO;2
It is funny that is was proposed in an ecology journal, but interestingly has been used in other fields including wealth distribution, computing, etc.
https://scholar.google.es/scholar?cites=12769940368116922741&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: