Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Constraint foojay-resolver version #946

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Goooler
Copy link
Member

@Goooler Goooler commented Aug 27, 2024

No description provided.

@Goooler Goooler marked this pull request as draft August 27, 2024 01:38
@Goooler Goooler force-pushed the g/constraint-foojay-version branch from d6ac021 to a7b46f1 Compare August 27, 2024 02:02
@Goooler Goooler closed this Sep 13, 2024
@Goooler Goooler deleted the g/constraint-foojay-version branch September 13, 2024 09:10
@Goooler Goooler restored the g/constraint-foojay-version branch January 14, 2025 04:15
@Goooler Goooler reopened this Jan 14, 2025
…o g/constraint-foojay-version

// Conflicts:
//	gradle/dependencies.gradle
//	settings.gradle
//	src/test/groovy/com/github/jengelman/gradle/plugins/shadow/ApplicationSpec.groovy
@Goooler Goooler marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2025 04:20
@Goooler Goooler enabled auto-merge (squash) January 14, 2025 04:22
@Goooler Goooler merged commit 5e6ab6e into main Jan 14, 2025
7 checks passed
@Goooler Goooler deleted the g/constraint-foojay-version branch January 14, 2025 04:26
Comment on lines +132 to +134
val functionalTestImplementation = configurations.named("functionalTestImplementation") {
isCanBeResolved = true
}
Copy link
Member Author

@Goooler Goooler Jan 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://scans.gradle.com/s/glik7aulnjtnu/deprecations#56

Calling setCanBeResolved(true) on configuration ':functionalTestImplementation' has been deprecated.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixing in #1163.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant