-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
fix(retail): add region tag for node.js - Update search with ordering #4131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(retail): add region tag for node.js - Update search with ordering #4131
Conversation
Added region tag to simply search query for code snippet update in the documentation.
Update search-simple-query.js for code snippet updates in retail/commerce documentation.
…h-pagination-sample fix(retail): add region tag for JS - Search_With_Pagination sample
|
Here is the summary of changes. You are about to add 1 region tag.
This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @rebeccaellis, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on enhancing the retail/interactive-tutorials/search/search-with-ordering.js Node.js sample by incorporating standard region tags. This change is a maintenance fix aimed at improving the sample's integration with documentation systems, allowing for easier and more reliable code snippet extraction.
Highlights
- Documentation Tagging: Added
[START]and[END]region tags to theretail/interactive-tutorials/search/search-with-ordering.jsfile. These tags, specificallysearch_for_products_with_ordering, are crucial for automated extraction of code snippets, improving documentation and sample discoverability.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds [START] and [END] region tags to the search-with-ordering.js Node.js sample. This is a useful change for documentation generation purposes.
While reviewing the code within the newly added region tags, I identified a potential improvement for robustness. In search-with-ordering.js, the main function calls callSearch() without using await. Although the script may function correctly in this isolated case because the Node.js process waits for the event loop to be empty, it is a best practice to await asynchronous function calls. This ensures a predictable execution order and more straightforward error handling. I recommend changing callSearch(); to await callSearch(); on line 76.
Since this feedback applies to code outside of the changed lines in this PR, I'm including it here as a general comment for your consideration.
Description
Fixes #415382524
Note: Before submitting a pull request, please open an issue for discussion if you are not associated with Google.
Checklist
npm test(see Testing)npm run lint(see Style)GoogleCloudPlatform/nodejs-docs-samples. Not a fork.