Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial AuctionSuperApp and claim tests #39

Merged
merged 47 commits into from
Feb 10, 2022
Merged

Initial AuctionSuperApp and claim tests #39

merged 47 commits into from
Feb 10, 2022

Conversation

codynhat
Copy link
Member

@codynhat codynhat commented Feb 4, 2022

Initial implementation and testing of AuctionSuperApp

Includes test cases for claiming and should unblock #37

I've created a v1 branch as the main branch to capture the new Superfluid and auction design.

@@ -2,5 +2,6 @@ module.exports = {
mocha: {
grep: "@skip-on-coverage", // Find everything with this tag
invert: true, // Run the grep's inverse set.
enableTimeouts: false,
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was needed to support Superfluid tests that take longer

@codynhat
Copy link
Member Author

codynhat commented Feb 4, 2022

@brossetti1 I added solidity-coverage awhile back. The coverage results are currently being included in the repo, but maybe they shouldn't? We could ignore coverage results and just have a separate branch that generates them from a CI action or something?

return superApp;
}

async function claimSuccess() {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@brossetti1 Here is an example of performing a claim by creating a flow. This may be useful for your work.

@codynhat codynhat requested a review from brossetti1 February 4, 2022 18:59
@codynhat codynhat merged commit 607d8d0 into v1 Feb 10, 2022
@codynhat codynhat deleted the feat/ethx-auction branch February 10, 2022 22:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant