This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 9, 2021. It is now read-only.
Proof conventions #190
Merged
Proof conventions #190
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
brianhuffman
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2021
|
@brianhuffman, what order do you want this to land with respect to other PRs in flight? |
|
I don't have a particular preference about merge order of PRs. This one can go first if you like. |
Change the type of `EqTrue` to be in `Prop`. Fix a bug in the `scTypeOf` code that prevented it from treating `Prop` as impredicative.
robdockins
force-pushed
the
proof-conventions2
branch
from
70d9b53
to
c6e16b8
Compare
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
More proof convention refactoring