-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
change pretty-printing of floats because of LLVM IR restrictions #137
Draft
Ptival
wants to merge
1
commit into
GaloisInc:master
Choose a base branch
from
Ptival:vr/no-32bit-float-constants
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
change pretty-printing of floats because of LLVM IR restrictions
As was pointed out by @tomsmeding here: #135 (comment) we cannot use 32-bit (8 characters) "float" constants in LLVM IR. Instead, we must embed the 32-bit float as 64-bit double constants with the same meaning.
- Loading branch information
commit 50173e773568a34411ad3f72ec3d25a664827fc0
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After this PR, we will now always display
float
-typed constants in hexadecimal form, even values that aren't infinite or NaNs. Is that desirable? (As #135 (comment) shows, it's still possible to write things likefloat 1.0
.)Regardless of what choice we make here, we should add some test cases that exercise the pretty-printing code for non-infinite, non-NaN values at type
float
anddouble
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Something that I apparently haven't run into yet, but as also mentioned in the documentation, LLVM will only accept "readable" constants if they exactly match a floating-point value. In particular,
1.3
is accepted fordouble
but not forfloat
.It may simply be easier to always output floating-point constants in hexadecimal form, so that we never run into issues like this. (And for my particular purpose, I don't care very much about readability of floating-point constants.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wow. That's quite tricky.
In that case, I agree that if there isn't a straightforward way to determine if LLVM will accept the output of calling the
float
function, then we should conservatively print allfloat
constants in hexadecimal form. It would also be worth mentioning the exact floating-point value requirement in the comments here, as I wasn't aware of that additional subtlety until just now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, if
float
prints things more nicely, and in a way that LLVM accepts, I can look into making this change less radical.