Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[optimize] simplify and beautify portBYTE_ALIGNMENT #309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2021
Merged

[optimize] simplify and beautify portBYTE_ALIGNMENT #309

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2021

Conversation

mysterywolf
Copy link
Contributor

[optimize] simplify and beautify portBYTE_ALIGNMENT

Test Steps

tested on STM32

Related Issue

Negative

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@mysterywolf mysterywolf requested a review from a team as a code owner April 14, 2021 05:56
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 14, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #309 (1ac1780) into main (05ded5b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #309   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.60%   90.60%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         532      532           
  Branches      142      142           
=======================================
  Hits          482      482           
  Misses         14       14           
  Partials       36       36           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 90.60% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 05ded5b...1ac1780. Read the comment docs.

@RichardBarry RichardBarry merged commit 99295c9 into FreeRTOS:main Apr 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants