-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
Expand docstrings #30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,8 +1,15 @@ | ||
```@docs | ||
Functors.@functor | ||
Functors.fmap | ||
Functors.@functor | ||
``` | ||
|
||
```@docs | ||
Functors.functor | ||
Functors.children | ||
Functors.isleaf | ||
Functors.fcollect | ||
``` | ||
|
||
```@docs | ||
Functors.fmapstructure | ||
Functors.fcollect | ||
``` |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's important to know that
exclude
is used beforefunctor
, it stops the recursion, rather than just controlling whetherf
is applied. I'm not sure that's what we want, but it's what we have.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this is deliberate because it's the easiest way to control the depth of recursion. Looking back on #13, I think it might've been better just to call this
isleaf
: that's literally what it's checking andexclude
could imply thatf
is not being applied to anything the function predicate says is true.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. Maybe all names for such things are confusing...
What it sounds like it might do is let you tell
fmap(sqrt, (2, Foo(3, sin)))
which leaves to applyf
to, and which to leave alone, without altering recursion. I guess you can testisleaf
first. Maybe all functionality can be written in terms of any other...Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a little confusing because
f
is also used as a name for not the original user callback, but in essence Functors will try to recurse into anything "left alone" byisleaf
/exclude
. It's just that the fallback definition offunctor
returns an empty tuple of children, so recursion naturally stops if the value in question can't be unpacked.