Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updating the deposit to no longer accept funds from the investor. #3

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023

Conversation

ChrisKenison
Copy link
Contributor

instead, it will pull the funds from the investor's address. it is assumed that all the funds committed are being deposited - for now

…tead, it will pull the funds from the investor's address. it is assumed that all the funds committed are being deposited - for now
@ChrisKenison ChrisKenison requested a review from Taztingo August 29, 2023 15:23
test.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tsilva-figure
Copy link

is this a work around to not being to sending restricted marker with a contract exec message as funds?

.expect("Should not throw error");
assert_eq!(0, response.messages.len());
assert_eq!(1, response.messages.len());

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we add any assertions to ensure we have the correct sender / recipient relationship on the marker transfer message?

@ChrisKenison
Copy link
Contributor Author

is this a work around to not being to sending restricted marker with a contract exec message as funds?

Yes - before, the funds were being sent along with the message - and investors can't send restricted markers (usd.deposit)

wrouten-figure
wrouten-figure previously approved these changes Aug 29, 2023
@ChrisKenison ChrisKenison merged commit 5b3a8bd into main Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants