Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the rest of redis cluster arguments #60

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

dudizimber
Copy link
Contributor

@dudizimber dudizimber commented Sep 16, 2024

fix #59

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced cluster connection capabilities with additional parameters for improved configurability and error handling.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved robustness and adaptability of the cluster connection process.

@dudizimber dudizimber linked an issue Sep 16, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the Cluster_Conn function of the falkordb/cluster.py file enhance the parameters passed to the RedisCluster constructor. The function now retrieves additional parameters such as startup_nodes, cluster_error_retry_attempts, and others, allowing for greater flexibility and configurability in establishing a cluster connection.

Changes

File Change Summary
falkordb/cluster.py Modified Cluster_Conn(conn, ssl) to include additional parameters for RedisCluster instantiation.

Possibly related PRs

  • support cluster connection #51: The Cluster_Conn function in this PR is directly related as it also involves the creation of a RedisCluster connection, which is enhanced in the main PR by adding more parameters for flexibility.

🐇 In the code, we hop and play,
New parameters brighten the way.
With clusters now more robust and bright,
Our connections dance in the moonlight!
Hooray for changes, let’s cheer and say,
"Code is magic, hip-hip-hooray!" 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.98%. Comparing base (bae5d01) to head (4dd16d3).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
falkordb/cluster.py 0.00% 16 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #60      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.37%   91.98%   -0.39%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines        2596     2607      +11     
==========================================
  Hits         2398     2398              
- Misses        198      209      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
falkordb/cluster.py (1)

11-14: Add test coverage for the new functionality.

The static analysis tool has reported missing test coverage for the added lines in the Cluster_Conn function. It's crucial to ensure that the new functionality is thoroughly tested to maintain the reliability and stability of the library.

Please consider adding appropriate unit tests to cover the following line ranges:

  • Lines 11-14: Extracting host, port, username, and password.
  • Lines 16-20: Extracting startup_nodes, cluster_error_retry_attempts, retry, retry_on_timeout, and retry_on_error.
  • Lines 25-30: Extracting require_full_coverage, reinitialize_steps, read_from_replicas, dynamic_startup_nodes, url, and address_remap.
  • Line 32: Constructing the RedisCluster instance.

Adequate test coverage will help catch potential issues, ensure the correctness of the implemented functionality, and provide confidence in the library's behavior.

Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?

Also applies to: 16-20, 25-30, 32-32

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 11-14: falkordb/cluster.py#L11-L14
Added lines #L11 - L14 were not covered by tests

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bae5d01 and 4dd16d3.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • falkordb/cluster.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
falkordb/cluster.py

[warning] 11-14: falkordb/cluster.py#L11-L14
Added lines #L11 - L14 were not covered by tests


[warning] 16-20: falkordb/cluster.py#L16-L20
Added lines #L16 - L20 were not covered by tests


[warning] 25-30: falkordb/cluster.py#L25-L30
Added lines #L25 - L30 were not covered by tests


[warning] 32-32: falkordb/cluster.py#L32
Added line #L32 was not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (1)
falkordb/cluster.py (1)

11-49: Excellent work on enhancing the Cluster_Conn function!

The changes significantly improve the flexibility and configurability of the cluster connection by incorporating additional parameters for the RedisCluster constructor. This allows users to fine-tune the connection behavior based on their specific requirements and handle various operational scenarios more effectively.

The expanded set of options, such as startup_nodes, cluster_error_retry_attempts, retry, retry_on_timeout, retry_on_error, require_full_coverage, reinitialize_steps, read_from_replicas, dynamic_startup_nodes, url, and address_remap, enables greater control over the cluster connection and improves the library's compatibility with different Redis cluster configurations.

The default values chosen for parameters like cluster_error_retry_attempts and retry_on_error seem reasonable and provide a good starting point for users.

Overall, these changes enhance the robustness, adaptability, and usability of the Cluster_Conn function, making it a valuable addition to the FalkorDB Python library.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 11-14: falkordb/cluster.py#L11-L14
Added lines #L11 - L14 were not covered by tests


[warning] 16-20: falkordb/cluster.py#L16-L20
Added lines #L16 - L20 were not covered by tests


[warning] 25-30: falkordb/cluster.py#L25-L30
Added lines #L25 - L30 were not covered by tests


[warning] 32-32: falkordb/cluster.py#L32
Added line #L32 was not covered by tests

@dudizimber dudizimber merged commit 29cd55c into main Sep 16, 2024
7 of 9 checks passed
@dudizimber dudizimber deleted the 59-add-the-rest-of-redis-cluster-arguments branch September 16, 2024 19:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add the rest of Redis cluster arguments
2 participants