Fix markdown formatting in Browser documentation

[shahar-biron]

Convert broken markdown tables to proper bullet lists and numbered lists for better readability and correct rendering.

Changes:

• Convert feature tables to bullet lists with sub-bullets
• Convert workflow steps to numbered lists
• Maintain all original content and structure

Co-Authored-By: Warp agent@warp.dev

PR Summary by Typo

Overview

This PR addresses markdown formatting inconsistencies in the Browser documentation, aiming to improve readability.

Key Changes

The primary change involves refactoring several feature description tables into more readable bulleted lists. This includes adding bullet points and bolding feature names for improved clarity and consistent documentation style.

Work Breakdown

Category	Lines Changed
New Work	31 (32.6%)
Churn	8 (8.4%)
Rework	56 (58.9%)
Total Changes	95

To turn off PR summary, please visit Notification settings.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated README with improved formatting and structure for better readability. Converted tabular layouts to organized bullet-point lists across multiple sections, including graph exploration, querying, data manipulation, and settings. Applied consistent formatting and refined descriptions for clarity while preserving all content.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[typo-app]

Static Code Review 📊

✅ All quality checks passed!

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation formatting restructuring in the browser README file. Tables were converted to bold headings with bullet-point lists across multiple feature sections. Minor wording adjustments for consistency. No functional code changes introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Restructuring browser/readme-browser.md	Reformatted feature descriptions from tabular layout to bold section headings with bullet-point lists. Updated sections include Graph exploration, Querying, Query history, Data manipulation, Graph management, Graph Info panel, API Documentation, Authentication & access control, Settings, and Common Workflows. Minor textual adjustments for clarity.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's verse on format bright,
Tables transformed to bullets' light,
Words rearranged with careful care,
Documentation now more fair,
Hopping through the README's delight! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: converting broken markdown formatting in the Browser documentation to properly formatted lists.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[typo-app]

AI Code Review 🤖

Files Reviewed: 1
Comments Added: 0
Lines of Code Analyzed: 151
Critical Issues: 0

PR Health: Excellent 🔥

_{Give 👍 or 👎 on each review comment to help us improve.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

browser/readme-browser.md (1)

43-49: Query history section formatting is acceptable, though line 43 is slightly inconsistent.

Line 43 combines a bold heading with inline descriptive text ("stored in browser localStorage"), whereas other sections in this documentation use bold headings followed by sub-bullets. This is a minor stylistic inconsistency but does not harm readability. If stricter consistency is desired across all sections, consider moving the trailing text to a sub-bullet.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 814133e and 551b4d3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• browser/readme-browser.md

🔇 Additional comments (6)

browser/readme-browser.md (6)

18-29: Graph exploration section formatting looks correct.

The conversion from table to bullet-list structure is clean. Feature names are bolded, sub-bullets provide concise descriptions, and indentation is consistent (2 spaces). The structure is easy to scan.

---

32-40: Querying section is well-formatted.

Feature names are bolded with supporting details in sub-bullets. The inline code formatting (Monaco, Cypher) is preserved appropriately.

---

54-68: Data manipulation and Graph management sections follow the established formatting pattern well.

Bold feature names with supporting details in sub-bullets. Structure is clear and consistent.

---

71-81: Graph Info panel section is well-structured.

Feature names (Memory Usage tracking, Node Label tracking, Edge Type tracking, Property Keys tracking) are bolded with clear, concise descriptions in sub-bullets. The formatting supports quick scanning.

---

87-90: API Documentation, Authentication & access control, and Settings sections are properly formatted.

All three sections follow consistent list formatting with bolded feature/subsection headings and supporting details in sub-bullets. Inline code and emphasis are preserved correctly.

Also applies to: 96-100, 104-118

---

131-150: Common Workflows section correctly uses numbered lists for sequential steps.

Each workflow (Running and visualizing queries, Inspecting and editing elements, Working with query history, Exporting graph data) is presented as a numbered list (1, 2, 3, ...), which is the appropriate choice for step-by-step instructions. Formatting is clean and easy to follow.