Add documentation for missing procedures (fixes #268) #269
Conversation
- Add comprehensive documentation for algo.MSF (Minimum Spanning Forest) - Add db.idx.fulltext.queryRelationships to procedures table - Add db.idx.vector.queryNodes to procedures table with reference to vector indexing docs - Add db.idx.vector.queryRelationships to procedures table with reference to vector indexing docs - Update algorithms index to include MSF All four procedures mentioned in issue #268 are now documented: - algo.MSF: New dedicated page with examples and use cases - db.idx.fulltext.queryRelationships: Added to procedures table (already documented in indexing.md) - db.idx.vector.queryNodes: Added to procedures table (already documented in indexing.md) - db.idx.vector.queryRelationships: Added to procedures table (already documented in indexing.md)
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughAdds a new Minimum Spanning Forest (MSF) algorithm document and procedure entry, three new index/query procedures, a minor presentation change for the BFS procedure listing, and five new terms added to the repository wordlist. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant User as Client
participant Proc as algo.MSF (procedure)
participant Graph as GraphStorage
participant Algo as MSF Engine
rect rgba(76,175,80,0.08)
Note over User,Proc: Invocation
User->>Proc: CALL algo.MSF(config)
end
rect rgba(33,150,243,0.06)
Proc->>Graph: fetch nodes & relationships (filtered by config)
Graph-->>Proc: graph subset
Proc->>Algo: compute MSF (component-wise MST)
Algo-->>Proc: edges (src, dest, weight, relationshipType)
end
rect rgba(255,193,7,0.06)
Proc-->>User: yield src, dest, weight, relationshipType
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Areas for attention:
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
algorithms/msf.md (1)
161-166: Consider alternative phrasing for "very large graphs."Per style guidance, consider replacing "very" with a more specific descriptor.
-3. **Large Graphs**: For very large graphs, consider filtering by `sourceNodes` or `relationshipTypes` +3. **Large Graphs**: For large graphs (100K+ nodes), consider filtering by `sourceNodes` or `relationshipTypes`
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
algorithms/index.md(1 hunks)algorithms/msf.md(1 hunks)cypher/procedures.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: spellcheck
algorithms/index.md
[error] 1-1: Spellcheck failed: Misspelled words detected in this file.
algorithms/msf.md
[error] 1-1: Spellcheck failed: Misspelled words detected in this file.
cypher/procedures.md
[error] 1-1: Spellcheck failed: Misspelled words detected in this file.
🪛 LanguageTool
algorithms/msf.md
[style] ~165-~165: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...ght properties 3. Large Graphs: For very large graphs, consider filtering by `sourceNo...
(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
algorithms/msf.md
92-92: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
cypher/procedures.md
39-39: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
algorithms/index.md (1)
34-35: Addition follows established conventions and structure.The MSF entry integrates well with existing pathfinding algorithms, maintains consistent formatting, and includes a clear description. The link reference is accurate.
algorithms/msf.md (1)
1-176: Comprehensive documentation with clear structure and examples.The algorithm documentation is well-organized with thorough parameter explanations, multiple practical examples covering different use cases (unweighted, weighted, relationship filtering, source filtering, disconnected graphs), and clear performance characteristics. Configuration options and best practices are clearly documented.
cypher/procedures.md (1)
35-37: New procedure entries are well-formatted and properly documented.All four procedures integrate seamlessly into the table with consistent formatting, clear descriptions, and accurate cross-references to detailed documentation:
db.idx.fulltext.queryRelationships: links to Full-Text Indexing sectiondb.idx.vector.queryNodesanddb.idx.vector.queryRelationships: link to Vector Indexing sectionalgo.MSF: links to dedicated MSF algorithm documentationThe yields and arguments columns are correctly specified.
Also applies to: 40-40
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds comprehensive documentation for previously undocumented procedures, specifically addressing issue #268. The main focus is documenting the Minimum Spanning Forest (MSF) algorithm and adding three vector/full-text search procedures to the procedures table.
Key Changes:
- Added complete MSF algorithm documentation with examples, configuration options, and use cases
- Added three indexing-related procedures to the procedures table with references to existing documentation
- Updated the algorithms index to include MSF
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| cypher/procedures.md | Added four procedure entries: full-text relationship query, two vector search procedures, and MSF algorithm |
| algorithms/msf.md | New comprehensive documentation page for the MSF algorithm including syntax, examples, and best practices |
| algorithms/index.md | Added MSF algorithm entry to the algorithms overview list |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| | db.idx.fulltext.createNodeIndex | `label`, `property` [, `property` ...] | none | Builds a full-text searchable index on a label and the 1 or more specified properties. | | ||
| | db.idx.fulltext.drop | `label` | none | Deletes the full-text index associated with the given label. | | ||
| | db.idx.fulltext.queryNodes | `label`, `string` | `node`, `score` | Retrieve all nodes that contain the specified string in the full-text indexes on the given label. | | ||
| | db.idx.fulltext.queryRelationships | `relationshipType`, `string` | `relationship`, `score` | Retrieve all relationships that contain the specified string in the full-text indexes on the given relationship type. See [Full-Text Indexing](/cypher/indexing#full-text-indexing) for details. | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The line numbering appears inconsistent. Line 35 follows line 34 directly, but the surrounding context shows lines 32-34 already exist. This creates a numbering gap and could indicate misaligned line numbers in the diff.
| -----|----|--------- | ||
| B | C | 1.0 | ||
| A | B | 2.0 | ||
| A | C | 3.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The example result is incorrect. According to Kruskal's/Prim's algorithm for MSF, once nodes A, B, and C are connected (via edges B-C with weight 1.0 and A-B with weight 2.0), the edge A-C with weight 3.0 would create a cycle and should not be included in the MSF. The correct result should only include edges with weights 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 6.0.
| A | C | 3.0 |
- Fix invalid link fragment in procedures.md (removed broken #BFS anchor) - Add language specification to code block in msf.md (line 92) - Replace 'very large graphs' with specific metric '100K+ nodes' - Add missing technical terms to wordlist: MST, Kruskal, Prim
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
FalkorDB_Product_Overview.md (2)
96-96: Minor: Remove redundant phrase in temporal reasoning capability."Evolve over time" is redundant since "evolve" already implies temporal change. Simplify to "Track how relationships evolve."
230-230: Minor: Use hyphenated form for compound adjective.When "Server Side Public License" modifies the following noun, it should be hyphenated: "Server-Side Public License v1 (SSPLv1)".
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.wordlist.txt(1 hunks)FalkorDB_Product_Overview.md(1 hunks)PR_SUMMARY_268.md(1 hunks)algorithms/msf.md(1 hunks)cypher/procedures.md(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- algorithms/msf.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
FalkorDB_Product_Overview.md
[style] ~96-~96: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “evolve”.
Context: ...al Reasoning**: Track how relationships evolve over time - Multi-Agent Support: Share memory...
(EVOLVE_OVER_TIME)
[uncategorized] ~230-~230: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...cense FalkorDB is licensed under the Server Side Public License v1 (SSPLv1). --- ## ...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
FalkorDB_Product_Overview.md
39-39: Table column count
Expected: 4; Actual: 5; Too many cells, extra data will be missing
(MD056, table-column-count)
cypher/procedures.md
39-39: Table column count
Expected: 4; Actual: 5; Too many cells, extra data will be missing
(MD056, table-column-count)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.wordlist.txt (1)
391-393: Wordlist entries for MSF-related terminology are appropriate.The three new entries (MST, Kruskal, Prim) are standard algorithm terminology that would otherwise be flagged as misspellings. Their addition ensures the new MSF documentation and related content won't trigger false positives in spellcheck validation.
PR_SUMMARY_268.md (1)
1-73: Well-structured PR summary documentation.The summary clearly documents all changes, provides cross-references with specific line numbers to existing documentation, and includes practical testing recommendations. The organization helps reviewers understand the scope and impact of the PR.
cypher/procedures.md (1)
35-37: Procedure documentation entries are well-formatted with appropriate cross-references.The four new procedure entries follow the existing table format, include clear argument and yield specifications, and provide helpful links to detailed documentation. Once the line 39 syntax error is corrected, these additions will properly extend the procedures reference.
Please verify that the documentation links in the "See" references match the actual anchor IDs in the target pages:
/cypher/indexing#full-text-indexing(line 35)/cypher/indexing#vector-indexing(lines 36-37)/algorithms/msf(line 40)Also applies to: 40-40
- Remove FalkorDB_Product_Overview.md and PR_SUMMARY_268.md - Add MSTs, Kruskal's, and Prim's to wordlist
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.wordlist.txt (1)
391-395: The new terms are correctly spelled and well-placed content-wise.The five additions (MSF, MST, MSTs, Kruskal's, Prim's) are all legitimate terms supporting the MSF algorithm documentation. However, they appear to be out of alphabetical order relative to the broader wordlist structure—earlier sections (lines 1–120+) maintain rough alphabetical ordering, and these new terms should probably be interleaved alphabetically with the surrounding entries rather than appended after SSpath.
For consistency with the rest of the file, consider reordering this section to: Kruskal's, MSF, MST, MSTs, Prim's, SPpath, SSpath, WCC, WSL.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
All four procedures mentioned in issue #268 are now documented:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores