-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Staging #64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThis pull request updates three UI components. Both the MemoryBarChart and VerticalBarChart components now use a new property Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @Naseem77, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request focuses on improving the visualization of data in the memory and vertical bar charts. The changes involve adjusting the positioning and alignment of data labels, modifying the logic for displaying ratio values, and reversing the Y-axis for better readability. Additionally, the descriptions for latency and memory usage on the dashboard have been updated to reflect that higher values are better.
Highlights
- MemoryBarChart Adjustments: The
maxValueprop has been renamed tominValue. The data label anchor and alignment have been changed to 'start'. The Y-axis has been reversed, and the X-axis position is now at the top. - VerticalBarChart Adjustments: The data label anchor and alignment have been changed to 'start'. The logic for displaying ratio values has been updated to use
minValueinstead ofmaxValue. The Y-axis has been reversed, and the X-axis position is now at the top. Also, the percentile key is now optional. - Dashboard Text Updates: The descriptions for latency and memory usage have been updated to indicate that '(HIGHER IS BETTER)'.
Changelog
Click here to see the changelog
- ui/app/components/MemoryBarChart.tsx
- Renamed
maxValueprop tominValue. - Changed data label anchor and alignment to 'start'.
- Added
position: 'top'to the x-axis scale. - Reversed the y-axis scale by adding
reverse: true.
- Renamed
- ui/app/components/VerticalBarChart.tsx
- Changed data label anchor and alignment to 'start'.
- Updated logic for displaying ratio values to use
minValue. - Added
position: 'top'to the x-axis scale. - Reversed the y-axis scale by adding
reverse: true. - Made the percentile key optional to avoid errors.
- ui/app/components/dashboard.tsx
- Updated the latency description to '(HIGHER IS BETTER)'.
- Updated the memory usage description to '(HIGHER IS BETTER)'.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Did you know?
The first known use of a data chart is often credited to Michael Florent van Langren, a Dutch astronomer and cartographer, in 1644. He visually represented the different estimates of the distance between Toledo and Rome.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request introduces changes to chart configurations and descriptions within the dashboard, primarily focusing on improving the display and interpretation of latency and memory usage data. The changes include adjusting chart labels, reversing axes, and updating descriptive text to better reflect the data being presented. Overall, the changes seem beneficial for enhancing the user experience and data clarity.
Summary of Findings
- Inverted Logic in Dashboard Component: The dashboard component contains inverted logic in the text descriptions for latency and memory usage. The descriptions currently state '(HIGHER IS BETTER)' when they should state '(LOWER IS BETTER)' for latency and vice versa for memory usage.
- Potential Confusion with minValue and maxValue: The naming of
minValueandmaxValuein the context of the charts might be misleading, especially since the charts are being reversed. Consider renaming these tominDisplayValueandmaxDisplayValueto better reflect their purpose. - Inconsistent use of undefined checks: There are some inconsistencies in how undefined checks are performed, particularly in the
VerticalBarChartcomponent. Using optional chaining (?.) consistently can improve readability and safety.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is almost ready for merging. However, the inverted logic in the dashboard component's text descriptions for latency and memory usage should be corrected before merging. Additionally, consider the suggestions for clarifying variable names and ensuring consistent undefined checks to improve code readability and maintainability. I am unable to approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging. At a minimum, the critical and high severity issues should be addressed before merging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
ui/app/components/MemoryBarChart.tsx (1)
26-33: Interface includes bothmaxValueandminValuebut onlyminValueis usedThe
MemoryBarChartPropsinterface includes bothmaxValueandminValueproperties, but the component implementation only destructures and usesminValue. This creates confusion and inconsistency.interface MemoryBarChartProps { singleMemory: { vendor: string; memory: number }[]; unit: string; ratio: number; - maxValue: number; minValue: number; getBarColor: (vendor: string) => string; }ui/app/components/dashboard.tsx (1)
394-402:maxValueprop is passed but not used in MemoryBarChart componentThe MemoryBarChart component is receiving both
maxValueandminValueprops, but the implementation only usesminValue. Either remove the unusedmaxValueprop or update the component to use both.<MemoryBarChart singleMemory={singleMemory} ratio={singleMemoryRatio} - maxValue={maxSingleMemory} minValue={minSingleMemory} unit="MB" getBarColor={getBarColor} />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
ui/app/components/MemoryBarChart.tsx(3 hunks)ui/app/components/VerticalBarChart.tsx(3 hunks)ui/app/components/dashboard.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
ui/app/components/MemoryBarChart.tsx (4)
39-40: LGTM! Parameter change reflects new logicThe parameter destructuring now correctly uses
minValueinstead ofmaxValue, aligning with the reversed chart logic.
80-82: LGTM! Anchor and alignment changes support the reversed chart orientationChanging the data label anchor and alignment from "end"/"top" to "start"/"start" properly supports the new chart orientation where higher values are better.
89-90: LGTM! Formatter logic updated to check against minValueThe formatter logic has been correctly updated to check against
minValueinstead ofmaxValue, in line with the new "higher is better" approach.
95-96: LGTM! Chart orientation reversed to highlight higher valuesThe x-axis position set to "top" and y-axis reverse property set to true effectively flips the chart orientation to align with the "higher is better" paradigm.
Also applies to: 110-111
ui/app/components/dashboard.tsx (2)
346-347: LGTM! Updated text correctly reflects new performance metric interpretationChanging the text from "(LOWER IS BETTER)" to "(HIGHER IS BETTER)" for latency aligns with the chart changes that now highlight higher performance values as favorable.
384-385: LGTM! Updated text correctly reflects new memory usage interpretationChanging the text from "(LOWER IS BETTER)" to "(HIGHER IS BETTER)" for memory usage is consistent with the chart changes and the overall paradigm shift in how performance metrics are displayed.
ui/app/components/VerticalBarChart.tsx (4)
66-68: LGTM! Anchor and alignment changes support the reversed chart orientationChanging the data label anchor and alignment from "end"/"top" to "start"/"start" properly supports the new chart orientation where higher values are better.
82-87: LGTM! Refactored percentileKey determination is more conciseThe conditional logic to determine the percentileKey has been nicely refactored using ternary operators, making the code more concise while maintaining functionality.
90-96: LGTM! Logic correctly updated to highlight minimum valuesThe formatter logic has been correctly updated to check against
minValueinstead ofmaxValueand display the ratio indicator accordingly, aligning with the new "higher is better" paradigm.
104-105: LGTM! Chart orientation reversed to highlight higher valuesSetting the x-axis position to "top" and adding
reverse: trueto the y-axis properly flips the chart orientation to align with the new "higher is better" approach.Also applies to: 122-123
Summary by CodeRabbit