Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

frrbot test issue #9575

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

frrbot test issue #9575

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

qlyoung
Copy link
Member

@qlyoung qlyoung commented Sep 6, 2021

Signed-off-by: Quentin Young qlyoung@nvidia.com

@qlyoung qlyoung force-pushed the ghapp-test-issue branch 5 times, most recently from a46f712 to a84d791 Compare September 6, 2021 17:47
@frrbot frrbot bot added the pim label Sep 6, 2021
@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Outdated results 💚

Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

_ _
Result SUCCESS git merge/9575 a84d791
Date 09/06/2021
Start 13:25:57
Finish 13:52:14
Run-Time 26:17
Total 1813
Pass 1813
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details vncregress-2021-09-06-13:25:57.txt
Log autoscript-2021-09-06-13:27:09.log.bz2
Memory 484 479 425

For details, please contact louberger

Copy link

@frrbot frrbot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution to FRR!

  • One of your commits has an improperly formatted commit message
    Style checking failed; check logs

If you are a new contributor to FRR, please see our contributing guidelines.

After making changes, you do not need to create a new PR. You should perform an amend or interactive rebase followed by a force push.

@qlyoung qlyoung force-pushed the ghapp-test-issue branch 2 times, most recently from c2e47db to 556c7f1 Compare September 6, 2021 18:13
Copy link

@frrbot frrbot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution to FRR!

  • One of your commits has an improperly formatted commit message

If you are a new contributor to FRR, please see our contributing guidelines.

After making changes, you do not need to create a new PR. You should perform an amend or interactive rebase followed by a force push.

@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Outdated results 💚

Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

_ _
Result SUCCESS git merge/9575 f685b50
Date 09/06/2021
Start 13:55:57
Finish 14:22:23
Run-Time 26:26
Total 1813
Pass 1813
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details vncregress-2021-09-06-13:55:57.txt
Log autoscript-2021-09-06-13:57:09.log.bz2
Memory 481 500 426

For details, please contact louberger

@qlyoung
Copy link
Member Author

qlyoung commented Sep 6, 2021

bingus

1 similar comment
@qlyoung
Copy link
Member Author

qlyoung commented Sep 6, 2021

bingus

Copy link

@frrbot frrbot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution to FRR!

  • One of your commits has an improperly formatted commit message

If you are a new contributor to FRR, please see our contributing guidelines.

After making changes, you do not need to create a new PR. You should perform an amend or interactive rebase followed by a force push.

@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Outdated results 💚

Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

_ _
Result SUCCESS git merge/9575 556c7f1
Date 09/06/2021
Start 14:25:58
Finish 14:52:14
Run-Time 26:16
Total 1813
Pass 1813
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details vncregress-2021-09-06-14:25:58.txt
Log autoscript-2021-09-06-14:27:13.log.bz2
Memory 510 513 426

For details, please contact louberger

Copy link

@frrbot frrbot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution to FRR!

  • One of your commits has an improperly formatted commit message

If you are a new contributor to FRR, please see our contributing guidelines.

After making changes, you do not need to create a new PR. You should perform an amend or interactive rebase followed by a force push.

Copy link

@frrbot frrbot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution to FRR!

  • One of your commits has an improperly formatted commit message

If you are a new contributor to FRR, please see our contributing guidelines.

After making changes, you do not need to create a new PR. You should perform an amend or interactive rebase followed by a force push.

@qlyoung
Copy link
Member Author

qlyoung commented Sep 6, 2021

@frrbot autoclose in 1 year

@frrbot frrbot bot added the autoclose label Sep 6, 2021
@qlyoung
Copy link
Member Author

qlyoung commented Sep 6, 2021

Nevermind

@frrbot frrbot bot removed the autoclose label Sep 6, 2021
@frrbot
Copy link

frrbot bot commented Sep 6, 2021

This issue will no longer be automatically closed.

@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Outdated results 💚

Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

_ _
Result SUCCESS git merge/9575 0bc08c7
Date 09/06/2021
Start 14:55:58
Finish 15:22:17
Run-Time 26:19
Total 1813
Pass 1813
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details vncregress-2021-09-06-14:55:58.txt
Log autoscript-2021-09-06-14:57:12.log.bz2
Memory 495 491 425

For details, please contact louberger

@frrbot frrbot bot added the tests Topotests, make check, etc label Sep 6, 2021
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@nvidia.com>
@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Outdated results 💚

Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

_ _
Result SUCCESS git merge/9575 412d9e7
Date 09/06/2021
Start 15:25:57
Finish 15:52:09
Run-Time 26:12
Total 1813
Pass 1813
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details vncregress-2021-09-06-15:25:57.txt
Log autoscript-2021-09-06-15:27:08.log.bz2
Memory 508 516 422

For details, please contact louberger

@qlyoung qlyoung closed this Sep 6, 2021
@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Outdated results 💚

Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

_ _
Result SUCCESS git merge/9575 7d700c8
Date 09/06/2021
Start 15:55:58
Finish 16:22:17
Run-Time 26:19
Total 1813
Pass 1813
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details vncregress-2021-09-06-15:55:58.txt
Log autoscript-2021-09-06-15:57:15.log.bz2
Memory 510 516 424

For details, please contact louberger

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-18/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-20/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-17/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1: Failed (click for details) Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1: No useful log found
Successful on other platforms/tests
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9
  • IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 1
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 4
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 2
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 5
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 0
  • Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6
  • IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 6
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 5
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
  • IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Test incomplete. See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-22/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Incomplete

Addresssanitizer topotests part 2: Incomplete (check logs for details)
Successful on other platforms/tests
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 4
  • IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 2
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 1
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 0
  • IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
  • Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 7
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
  • Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8
  • IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-31/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-19/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-21/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9: Failed (click for details) Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9: No useful log found
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9: Failed (click for details) Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9: No useful log found
Successful on other platforms/tests
  • IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 2
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 1
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 0
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6
  • IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 5
  • Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
  • Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-23/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-32/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9: Failed (click for details) Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9: No useful log found
Successful on other platforms/tests
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 2
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 0
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 4
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 7
  • IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
  • IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
  • IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-33/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-35/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04: Failed (click for details)

RFC Compliance Test ANVL-LDP-9.5 failing:
Test Summary
Similarly, when the LSR learns a label for a prefix from an LDP peer,
it must be able to determine whether that peer is currently a next hop
for the prefix to determine whether it needs to start using the newly
learned label when forwarding packets that match the prefix.
Test Reference
RFC 3036, s2.7 p23 LDP Identifiers and Next Hop Addresses
Test Classification
MUST
Test ANVL-LDP-9.5: !FAILED!
Peer 192.168.0.101 did not forward MPLS packet with label 17

Successful on other platforms/tests
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 2
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 3
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 5
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 4
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6
  • Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
  • IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 9

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-36/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-34/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-38/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9: Failed (click for details) Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9: No useful log found
Successful on other platforms/tests
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 5
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 2
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 4
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 5
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 7
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
  • IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8
  • IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
  • IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
  • Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-40/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Warnings Generated during build:

Checkout code: Successful with additional warnings
Report for pim_join.c | 2 issues
===============================================
< WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
< #47: FILE: /tmp/f1-14067/pim_join.c:47:

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 6, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-37/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-39/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Warnings Generated during build:

Checkout code: Successful with additional warnings
Report for pim_join.c | 2 issues
===============================================
< WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
< #47: FILE: /tmp/f1-10477/pim_join.c:47:

@qlyoung qlyoung reopened this Sep 7, 2021
@qlyoung
Copy link
Member Author

qlyoung commented Sep 7, 2021

@frrbot rereview

@qlyoung
Copy link
Member Author

qlyoung commented Sep 7, 2021

@polychaeta rereview

@qlyoung
Copy link
Member Author

qlyoung commented Sep 7, 2021

@frrbot rereview

@qlyoung qlyoung closed this Sep 7, 2021
@qlyoung qlyoung reopened this Sep 9, 2021
@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Sep 9, 2021

💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

Results table
_ _
Result Complete
Date 08/17/2021
Start 20:42:12
Finish 21:06:54
Run-Time 24:42
Total 1813
Pass 1813
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details autoscript-2021-08-17-20:42:12.txt
Log autoscript-2021-08-17-20:42:12.log.bz2
Memory 511 495 421
SUCCESS git merge/9575 87d4ad1 Complete
09/08/2021 08/10/2021
20:42:16 20:42:10
21:08:33 21:06:27
26:17 24:17
1813 1813
1813 1813
0 0
0
0
vncregress-2021-09-08-20:42:16.txt autoscript-2021-08-10-20:42:10.txt
autoscript-2021-09-08-20:43:31.log.bz2 autoscript-2021-08-10-20:42:10.log.bz2
507 513 422 493 517 425

For details, please contact louberger

@qlyoung qlyoung closed this Sep 9, 2021
@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-94/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants