Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: add pceplib test output to gitignore #8375

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2021

Conversation

mjstapp
Copy link
Contributor

@mjstapp mjstapp commented Mar 31, 2021

Add some pcep unit-test output files to gitignore.

Add some pcep unit-test output files to gitignore.

Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@voltanet.io>
@mjstapp mjstapp added the build Issues with the build label Mar 31, 2021
@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Mar 31, 2021

💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

Results table
_ _
Result SUCCESS git merge/8375 6f94077
Date 03/31/2021
Start 08:35:42
Finish 09:17:20
Run-Time 41:38
Total 1815
Pass 1815
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details vncregress-2021-03-31-08:35:42.txt
Log autoscript-2021-03-31-08:36:48.log.bz2
Memory 481 477 430

For details, please contact louberger

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Mar 31, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-18116/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4: Failed (click for details) Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4: No useful log found
Successful on other platforms/tests
  • IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
  • Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 8
  • Debian 8 deb pkg check
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 6
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 4
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 5
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 4
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 7
  • Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 7
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 2
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3

@mjstapp
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjstapp commented Mar 31, 2021

CI failure is one of the bgp GR suites, again.

@mjstapp
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjstapp commented Mar 31, 2021

CI:rerun

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Mar 31, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-18124/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 9: Failed (click for details)

Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U16I386-18124/test

Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 9:

2021-03-31 18:53:11,923 ERROR: 'router_json_cmp' failed after 134.86 seconds
2021-03-31 18:53:11,925 ERROR: assert failed at "test_ospf_te_topo1/test_step1": "r2" TED JSON output mismatches the expected result
assert Generated JSON diff error report:
  
  > $->ted->edges: d2 has the following element at index 6 which is not present in d1: 
  
  	{
  	    "status": "Sync",
  	    "origin": "OSPFv2",
  	    "advertised-router": "10.0.255.4",
  	    "local-vertex-id": 167837444,
  	    "metric": 10,
  	    "remote-vertex-id": 167837442,
  	    "edge-id": 167773185,
  	    "segment-routing": [
  	        {
  	            "adj-sid": 5001,
  	            "flags": "0x60",
  	            "weight": 0
  	        },
  	        {
  	            "adj-sid": 5000,
  	            "flags": "0xe0",
  	            "weight": 0
  	        }
  	    ],
  	    "edge-attributes": {
  	        "remote-address": "10.0.4.2",
  	        "max-link-bandwidth": 176258176.0,
  	        "max-resv-link-bandwidth": 176258176.0,
  	        "local-address": "10.0.4.1",
  	        "te-metric": 0,
  	        "unreserved-bandwidth": [
  	            {
  	                "class-type-0": 176258176.0
  	            },
  	            {
  	                "class-type-1": 176258176.0
  	            },
  	            {
  	                "class-type-2": 176258176.0
  	            },
  	            {
  	                "class-type-3": 176258176.0
  	            },
  	            {
  	                "class-type-4": 176258176.0
  	            },
  	            {
  	                "class-type-5": 176258176.0
  	            },
  	            {
  	                "class-type-6": 176258176.0
  	            },
  	            {
  	                "class-type-7": 176258176.0
  	            }
  	        ]
  	    }
  	}
  
  	Closest match in d1 is at index 0 with the following errors: 
  
  	> $->ted->edges[0]->segment-routing: d2 has the following element at index 1 which is not present in d1: 
  	
  		{
  		    "adj-sid": 5000,
  		    "flags": "0xe0",
  		    "weight": 0
  		}
  	
  		Closest match in d1 is at index 0 with the following errors: 
  	
  		> $->ted->edges[0]->segment-routing[0]->adj-sid: d1 has element with value '11304359' but in d2 it has value '5000'
  		> $->ted->edges[0]->segment-routing[0]->flags: d1 has element with value '0xc0' but in d2 it has value '0xe0'
  		> $->ted->edges[0]->segment-routing[0]->weight: d1 has element with value '1' but in d2 it has value '0'
  	
  
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
2021-03-31 19:00:07,220 ERROR: r3: bgpd left a dead pidfile (pid=5854)
2021-03-31 19:00:37,652 WARNING: vtysh_cmd: failed to convert json output
2021-03-31 19:01:00,133 WARNING: vtysh_cmd: failed to convert json output
2021-03-31 19:07:06,215 ERROR: r1: bgpd left a dead pidfile (pid=13612)
2021-03-31 19:11:42,831 ERROR: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U16I386/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 1689, in create_interfaces_cfg
    tgen, c_router, interface_data, "interface_config", build=build
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U16I386/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 290, in create_common_configuration
    load_config_to_router(tgen, router)
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U16I386/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 575, in load_config_to_router
    raise InvalidCLIError("%s" % output)
InvalidCLIError: line 3: % Unknown command[16]: ip ospf hello-interval 65536 


2021-03-31 19:12:24,848 ERROR: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U16I386/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 1689, in create_interfaces_cfg
    tgen, c_router, interface_data, "interface_config", build=build
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U16I386/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 290, in create_common_configuration
    load_config_to_router(tgen, router)
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U16I386/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 575, in load_config_to_router
    raise InvalidCLIError("%s" % output)
InvalidCLIError: line 3: % Unknown command[16]: ip ospf dead-interval 65536 

see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-18124/artifact/TOPO9U16I386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt

Successful on other platforms/tests
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
  • IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 2
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 9
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 8
  • Debian 8 deb pkg check
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
  • IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 7
  • Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 5
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 0
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 i386 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0

@mjstapp
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjstapp commented Mar 31, 2021

And another bogus failure - CI is impossible today

@mjstapp
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjstapp commented Mar 31, 2021

CI:rerun

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-18127/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@donaldsharp donaldsharp merged commit c3ac2e5 into FRRouting:master Apr 1, 2021
@mjstapp mjstapp deleted the fix_ignore_pcep_test_files branch April 5, 2021 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build Issues with the build
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants