-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bgpd: IPv6 session flapping with MP_REACH_NLRI and 0.0.0.0 in NEXT_HOP attribute #4258
Conversation
…P attribute This is causing interop issues with vendors. According to the RFC, receiver should ignore the NEXT_HOP attribute with MP_REACH_NLRI present. Signed-off-by: nikos ntriantafillis@gmail.com
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-7493/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7493/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Successful on other platforms
Topology Tests memory analysis: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7493/artifact/TOPOU1604/MemoryLeaks/CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base12 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
@mwinter-osr Is the failure expected? I don't believe it's related to my change by looking at it. Please let me know. |
ci:rerun |
@mwinter-osr Is the failure related to a CI issue? Because it's not related to my changes.
|
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7493/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base12 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Successful on other platforms
Topology Tests memory analysis: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOU1604/MemoryLeaks/ Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt
CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base12 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
Let's get the CI issues cleaned up and then we finish this up |
ci:rerun |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Successful on other platforms
Topology Tests memory analysis: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOU1604/MemoryLeaks/ Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-7593/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7593/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt
CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base12 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
…P attribute This is causing interop issues with vendors. According to the RFC, receiver should ignore the NEXT_HOP attribute with MP_REACH_NLRI present. Signed-off-by: nikos <ntriantafillis@gmail.com>
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-7622/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warnings
CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base12 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
attribute [7.0] Port of FRRouting#4258 to stable/7.0 Signed-off-by: Pavel Shirshov <pavelsh@microsoft.com>
bgpd: IPv6 session flapping with MP_REACH_NLRI and 0.0.0.0 in NEXT_HOP attribute
This is causing interop issues with vendors. According to the RFC, receiver should ignore the NEXT_HOP attribute with MP_REACH_NLRI present. Issue reproduced with Arista peer and fix verified.
Fix should address #3768
Thanks,
Nikos.-
Signed-off-by: nikos ntriantafillis@gmail.com