isisd: consider link local ipv4 addresses as valid #13199
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
the following message may appear on cisco otherwise: |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-TOPO9U18AMD64-10599/test Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9 Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-10599/artifact/TOPO3U18I386/TopotestDetails/Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-TOPO3U18I386-10599/test Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3 Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-10599/artifact/TOPO6U18AMD64/TopotestLogs/ Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-10599/artifact/TOPO6U18AMD64/TopotestDetails/ Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6: No useful log foundSuccessful on other platforms/tests
|
pguibert6WIND
force-pushed
the
isis_ipv4_linklocal
branch
from
3ffb44b to
be422b7
Compare
It is not possible to create an adjacency by using interface addresses within the `169.254.0.0/24` pool. When forging the IIH messages, the interface addresses from that pool are not appended: > Neither IPv4 nor IPv6 considered usable. Ignoring IIH Using this network pool is possible on other IS-IS implementations. Let us authorize to use such network addresses. Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
pguibert6WIND
force-pushed
the
isis_ipv4_linklocal
branch
from
be422b7 to
9f04ffe
Compare
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests debian 10 amd64 part 9: Failed (click for details)Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-10616/artifact/TOPO9DEB10AMD64/TopotestLogs/ Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-10616/artifact/TOPO9DEB10AMD64/TopotestDetails/ Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9: No useful log foundSuccessful on other platforms/tests
|
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-10617/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
IS-IS circuits should consider link local ipv4 addresses as valid.