Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #162 from donmendelson/issue161
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
unionDataType should be an attribute of a code set, not field #161
  • Loading branch information
donmendelson authored Jul 20, 2022
2 parents 9bae267 + ee09886 commit 059a453
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 0 deletions.
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions repository/src/main/resources/xsd/repositorytypes.xsd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@
</xs:annotation>
</xs:attribute>
<xs:attributeGroup ref="fixr:entityAttribGrp"/>
<xs:attribute name="unionDataType" type="fixr:UnionDataType_t"/>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="codeType">
<xs:sequence>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1059,6 +1060,9 @@
<xs:union memberTypes="xs:nonNegativeInteger fixr:unbounded"/>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="UnionDataType_t">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>A second domain of valid values. The 'Reserved' types should only be applied Code Sets.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:enumeration value="Qty"/>
<xs:enumeration value="Reserved100Plus"/>
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 059a453

Please sign in to comment.