-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
Fix: Checkmark missing on Assignee Page #74636
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@mananjadhav Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
| @@ -222,6 +216,8 @@ function TaskAssigneeSelectorModal() { | |||
| onChangeText={setSearchTerm} | |||
| textInputValue={searchTerm} | |||
| headerMessage={headerMessage} | |||
| initiallyFocusedOptionKey={sections[0].data.find((mode) => mode.isSelected)?.keyForList} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❌ PERF-4 (docs)
The .find() operation on sections[0].data executes on every render, even when sections hasn't changed. This creates unnecessary computation overhead.
Suggested fix:
Memoize the focused option key:
const initiallyFocusedOptionKey = useMemo(() => {
return sections[0]?.data.find((mode) => mode.isSelected)?.keyForList;
}, [sections]);Then use it in the prop:
<SelectionList
initiallyFocusedOptionKey={initiallyFocusedOptionKey}
// ... other props
/>
Codecov Report✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!
|
|
Will test this tonight. |
|
@PiyushChandra17 The given tests steps work fine. But the same also needs to be fixed for Edit assignee screen.
assignee-checkmark-on-edit-assignee.mov |
heyjennahay
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No concerns with the product change
@mananjadhav I think this is a seperate issue and needs to be fixed seperately because as far as i am concern
cc: @heyjennahay |
|
@JS00001 What do you think? I think if it's a small fix should be done along in thie same PR. |
|
Yeah since its small, we can do it here |
|
@mananjadhav @JS00001 Cool, will do that first time at the desk tomm. |
|
@mananjadhav I'm working on this, will give the update .. |
|
Thanks for the update @PiyushChandra17. Ping me once ready for QA. |
|
@mananjadhav I have investigated into this, my conclusion:
isSelected={task?.assigneeAccountID === personalDetails?.accountID}Perhaps this doesn't seem to work, needs discussion here |
@mananjadhav I still think, this is a seperate issue since cc: @JS00001 |
|
Thanks for the analysis. Yes if the solution isn't the same, then we can create a separate issue.Keen on what @JS00001 thinks. |
Reviewer Checklist
Screenshots/VideosAndroid: HybridAppandroid-assignee.movAndroid: mWeb Chromemweb-chrome-assignee.moviOS: HybridAppiOS: mWeb Safarimweb-safari-assignee.movMacOS: Chrome / Safariweb-assignee.movMacOS: Desktopdesktop-assignee.mov |
mananjadhav
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have issues with my iOS build. Approved tested on all other platforms. Pending @JS00001 to check this comment.
|
@PiyushChandra17 Could you please post the task bug in #expensify-bugs, and then I'll merge this? |
|
@JS00001 I think i am not able to access my slack channel (already put a formal mail and form regarding this) due to some odd reasons, hence will not be able to report the task bug in #expensify-bugs. Perhaps i think @mananjadhav can do the same. Thanks! |
|
Sure, works for me, @mananjadhav Could you please post the bug in the bug reports channel? |
|
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/JS00001 in version: 9.2.60-0 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/JS00001 in version: 9.2.60-0 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/JS00001 in version: 9.2.60-0 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/grgia in version: 9.2.60-2 🚀
|



Explanation of Change
Checkmark missing on Assignee Page
Fixed Issues
$ #73761
PROPOSAL: #73761 (Comment)
Tests
Offline tests
QA Steps
Same as tests
// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectioncanBeMissingparam foruseOnyxtoggleReportand notonIconClick)src/languages/*files and using the translation methodSTYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))npm run compress-svg)Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop