Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Revert 54064 and 53396" #54263

Merged

Conversation

ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

@ishpaul777 ishpaul777 commented Dec 17, 2024

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #53086
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Sign up with new Account (say Account A). Completed Onboarding flow
  2. (On desktop, resize screen to mobile size) verify Tooltip on Concierge is displayed
  3. Create a workpace, go back and open FAB menu, Verify that a tooltip on QAB is visibile
  4. Go to search screen > Filters > Add and save a filter verify tooltip is shown on saved search threedot. (this is visible on desktop screen size only)
  5. As another user create a workspace, invite this user A to the workspace
  6. As user A go the invited workspace chat verify tooltip on "+" is shown.

Offline tests

QA Steps

Same as test steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@ishpaul777 ishpaul777 marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 20:02
@ishpaul777 ishpaul777 requested review from a team as code owners December 18, 2024 20:02
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from MarioExpensify and removed request for a team December 18, 2024 20:02
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 18, 2024

@MarioExpensify Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

ishpaul777 commented Dec 18, 2024

this reverts the revert of my previous PR #54064 and #53396 currently on HOLD until we figure out the regression it potenitially caused is fixed

cc @rayane-djouah

@MarioExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @rayane-djouah, as this is not a straight revert we'll need to review and do the checklist.

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

This is currently on HOLD until we figure out the regression it caused

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep i will set it up today re-test, but from a internal discussion i got to know that the regression was only happening on stag deployment was not reproducible on development

@puneetlath puneetlath self-requested a review December 19, 2024 15:50
const platform = getPlatform();
const isNarrowScreenOnWeb = shouldUseNarrowLayout && platform === CONST.PLATFORM.WEB;
const isFocused = useBottomTabIsFocused();
const [isSidebarLoaded] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.IS_SIDEBAR_LOADED, {initialValue: false});
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waiting till sidebar is loaded so we dont show the lower priority Fabbutton tooltip before the getStarted tooltip on conceirge chat..

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rayane-djouah I have confirmed that regression is not producabe for me at all, can you please retest and review this again?

Screen.Recording.2024-12-23.at.11.57.24.PM.mov

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Dec 23, 2024

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-12-23.at.11.23.06.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-12-23.at.9.43.16.PM.mov
iOS: Native
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2024-12-23.at.21.28.33.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2024-12-23.at.21.42.21.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-12-23.at.9.44.28.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-12-23.at.10.54.35.PM.mov

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

The regression is not reproducabe for me also

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Dec 23, 2024

I'm currently building android native app 🔄 Tested!

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

@ishpaul777 Could you please merge main branch and fix the Changed files ESLint check failing check?

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

merged main.

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

fix the Changed files ESLint check failing check?

hey changes in this PR is big, and we might have to revert if regression still occur on deployed app, lets keep this out of scope for now

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

I agree

Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-12-23.at.11.23.06.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-12-23.at.9.43.16.PM.mov
iOS: Native
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2024-12-23.at.21.28.33.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2024-12-23.at.21.42.21.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-12-23.at.9.44.28.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-12-23.at.10.54.35.PM.mov

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath all yours!

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

resolved conflicts!

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

puneetlath commented Dec 24, 2024

hey changes in this PR is big, and we might have to revert if regression still occur on deployed app, lets keep this out of scope for now

I agree with this reasoning. Going to go ahead and merge in spite of the failing ESLint test.

@puneetlath puneetlath merged commit de1b888 into Expensify:main Dec 24, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Dec 24, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 24, 2024

@puneetlath looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants